Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Apr 20, 2017, 04:49 PM Apr 2017

Getting out was Chaffetz's only good option

By Jennifer Rubin April 20 at 10:30 AM

-snip-

Unless you actually believe Chaffetz’s ambition and yen for the limelight were superseded by longing to spend more time with his family, it’s not too hard to figure out why he might want to get out — the sooner the better. Chaffetz’s shtick — bullyboy investigator targeting the right’s bogeymen — worked when Hillary Clinton and/or President Obama were his targets. It cannot work for him when his own party controls everything.

With President Trump in office, as we have written, Chaffetz’s party loyalty, time and again, outweighed legitimate oversight concerns. He couldn’t be bothered to explore violations of the emoluments clause, Trump family members’ gross conflicts of interest, Russian connections, Trump’s concealment of his tax returns and financial holdings — or anything else that might upset the Trumpkin base. Chaffetz’s refusal to do his job put him under the microscope of Democrats, the press and his own constituents.

A boisterous, angry crowd at a town-hall meeting in February left Chaffetz looking defensive and shaken. A Republican in Utah simply isn’t used to that kind of treatment. Like Trump, he lashed out at voters, accusing them of being liberal plants.

Chaffetz no doubt figured that he was in a no-win position. Do his oversight job, and the Trump mob would pillory him. Avoid his responsibility, and his political opponents and the press would bash him. It is hard enough these days for the ordinary House Republican to straddle the divide (between Trump and principles or Trump and constituents), but the ordinary House Republican is not a highly visible committee chairman. A back-bencher can lay low, avoid talk shows and bob and weave on votes that force him to choose between the White House and the base (e.g. health care). Chaffetz did not enjoy that “luxury” and is temperamentally unsuited to inconspicuous public service.

-snip-

more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/04/20/getting-out-was-chaffetzs-only-good-option/?utm_term=.8086c4841f51&wpisrc=nl_popns&wpmm=1#comments

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Getting out was Chaffetz's only good option (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2017 OP
Poor Jason Cary Apr 2017 #1
Fuck im... dhill926 Apr 2017 #2
Handslap Chaffetz is the prototype political hack. Eyeball_Kid Apr 2017 #3

Eyeball_Kid

(7,430 posts)
3. Handslap Chaffetz is the prototype political hack.
Thu Apr 20, 2017, 05:15 PM
Apr 2017

He's licked the derrieres of power so much, for so long, he can no longer taste dignity and self-respect. But not to worry for Jason. He's got plenty of lobbyist offers in his mailbox. He's made lots of billionaire friends during his licking sessions. He'll land a job in no time.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Getting out was Chaffetz'...