Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,005 posts)
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:16 AM Apr 2017

ICYMI: Justices Say E.P.A. Has Power to Act on Harmful Gases

We have an EPA that is hostile to science--as is the Trump Administration.






"The court further ruled that the agency could not sidestep its authority to regulate the greenhouse gases that contribute to global climate change unless it could provide a scientific basis for its refusal."



Justices Say E.P.A. Has Power to Act on Harmful Gases


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/washington/03scotus.html?smid=tw-share

By LINDA GREENHOUSE


APRIL 3, 2007

Photo
Car and truck tailpipe emissions account for about one-fourth of the country’s greenhouse gas emissions. Credit Alden Pellett/Associated Press

WASHINGTON, April 2 — In one of its most important environmental decisions in years, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate heat-trapping gases in automobile emissions. The court further ruled that the agency could not sidestep its authority to regulate the greenhouse gases that contribute to global climate change unless it could provide a scientific basis for its refusal.

The 5-to-4 decision was a strong rebuke to the Bush administration, which has maintained that it does not have the right to regulate carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping gases under the Clean Air Act, and that even if it did, it would not use the authority. The ruling does not force the environmental agency to regulate auto emissions, but it would almost certainly face further legal action if it failed to do so.

Writing for the majority, Justice John Paul Stevens said the only way the agency could “avoid taking further action” now was “if it determines that greenhouse gases do not contribute to climate change” or provides a good explanation why it cannot or will not find out whether they do.

Beyond the specific context for this case — so-called “tailpipe emissions” from cars and trucks, which account for about one-fourth of the country’s total emissions of heat-trapping gases — the decision is likely to have a broader impact on the debate over government efforts to address global warming..........


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ICYMI: Justices Say E.P.A. Has Power to Act on Harmful Gases (Original Post) riversedge Apr 2017 OP
In case you missed it. TexasProgresive Apr 2017 #1
I know they have no intention of protecting the enviroment. riversedge Apr 2017 #2

TexasProgresive

(12,153 posts)
1. In case you missed it.
Wed Apr 26, 2017, 09:31 AM
Apr 2017

ICYMI - In Case You Missed It

And in case you missed it the supremes are the BEST, most Beautiful, golden court ever to love a royal asshole. And the EPA having authority doesn't mean they will use it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»ICYMI: Justices Say E.P.A...