Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,196 posts)
Tue Jun 13, 2017, 10:15 PM Jun 2017

I helped draft Clintons impeachment articles

The charges against Trump are more serious
By Bob Inglis
June 13 at 3:10 PM

House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) asserted last week that if the president were a Democrat, the House wouldn’t be pursing impeachment. He must know that’s not true.

If FBI Director James B. Comey had angered a President Hillary Clinton by restarting the investigation into her private email server and she had fired him, Republicans would be howling. Rightly so.

Instead, Donald Trump won the election. Comey was pursuing an investigation into Russian meddling. It angered President Trump, and he fired Comey. But rather than howling, Republicans are whimpering. The chair of the Republican National Committee has even called for a halt to all investigations of collusion with Russia. That’s a problem ...

Confronting Trump will take more courage than it took when Republicans told President Richard Nixon that it was time for him to leave office. Not that Trump is more imposing than Nixon; Nixon was a serious president with significant accomplishments. The difference, now, is the presence of sycophantic media ...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/i-helped-draft-clintons-impeachment-articles-the-charges-against-trump-are-more-serious/2017/06/13/a15f819e-4fab-11e7-be25-3a519335381c_story.html?utm_term=.8ed0c997052c

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Nitram

(22,749 posts)
2. Another major difference is that Republicans have a majority in both houses.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:31 AM
Jun 2017

That is the most significant difference.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
4. And against Sessions.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 08:37 PM
Jun 2017

The chief law enforcement guy lied under oath, doesn't know the legal policy that "prevents" him from talking, and didn't show the slightest interest in the security breach our country faced and faces.

I guess as long as the hackers didn't smoke pot, there's nothing to worry about.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
11. Just to make my
Thu Jun 15, 2017, 01:16 PM
Jun 2017

...reference clear. Sessions once said he stopped liking the Klan when he learned they smoked pot. Or some paraphrase thereof.

DK504

(3,847 posts)
7. Well Inglis maybe you should keep shit like this in perspective, Bill got a BJ.
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 09:49 PM
Jun 2017

Not again the law. Bill was smarter than all the Rethugs in Congress combined. Again, not against the law.

The Traitor spoiling the WH and Oval Office has colluded with Russia, he has lied every day about his involvement in his dealing with Russian banks, his immoral fiber of his being, his ignorance, he allowed Russia to get their tentacles into our election process.

Ya' think this may be worse???? Such 20/20 hindsight there pal.

SCantiGOP

(13,862 posts)
13. Uh, not quite
Sat Jun 17, 2017, 01:34 PM
Jun 2017

Sex was not the charge against Clinton; the charge was for lying to a grand jury about it.
Inglis is a good guy. Lost his primary years ago 2-1 because he wasn't willing to toe the Tea Party line. Since then his emphasis has been on climate change and what the government's response to it should be.

Beacool

(30,245 posts)
8. Of course they are more serious!!!
Wed Jun 14, 2017, 10:15 PM
Jun 2017

Bill lied under oath about a few BJs that were of no concern to anyone other than to his wife. Trump lied about committing treason by colluding with the Russians to affect the results of a presidential election.



Nitram

(22,749 posts)
12. Gosh! Really? Lying about an affair between mutually consenting adults is not as bad as...
Fri Jun 16, 2017, 08:24 AM
Jun 2017

...obstruction of justice, money laundering, election tampering, conspiring against the US with a hostile nation, lying under oath, and who knows what else?

 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
14. Then will they stop trying to go after the Democratic CANDIDATE when they need to distract from thei
Tue Jun 20, 2017, 01:50 PM
Jun 2017

r own problems? They were already ready to impeach Hillary if she won the election, so we should totally believe that they wouldn't try if she was openly bragging about sharing classified intelligence with Russia or urging a foreign country to hack our elections?

Skittles

(153,103 posts)
15. good article, except "....free-enterprise and individual-accountability solutions"
Wed Jun 21, 2017, 06:14 PM
Jun 2017

that's pure repuke-speak

what they REALLY mean is, let rich white men fuck you over

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»I helped draft Clintons i...