The Trump campaign's attempted collusion - WaPo Editorial Board
FOR MONTHS, the Donald Trump campaign and then the Trump administration not only have cast doubt on the facts of Russian interference in the 2016 election but also have denied there was contact between Russian agents and Trump surrogates. We now know that this insistence was at best highly misleading. Top Trump officials met with a Kremlin-allied Russian lawyer in June 2016 and they did so with the express hope of receiving compromising information about their Democratic rival. This represents a grave new set of facts in the ongoing investigation into possible Russian-Trump collusion.
The meeting, as first reported by the New York Times, took place after Mr. Trump had clinched the Republican presidential nomination but before the convention. Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, who has campaigned against Western-imposed sanctions on Russia, met with Mr. Trumps closest advisers: his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr.; his son-in-law, Jared Kushner; and the Trump campaign chairman at the time, Paul Manafort. The meeting was suggested, as The Post reported Monday, by a Russian pop star whose family has business ties both to the Russian government and to Mr. Trump.
For months, officials failed to disclose this meeting. When the record was corrected, they then mischaracterized its purpose. Mr. Trump Jr. and Reince Priebus, the White House chief of staff, passed it off as a nothing meeting, as Mr.?Priebus said Sunday, that was apparently about Russian adoption meaning about a controversy over whether foreigners could adopt Russian orphans. But hours later, after further reporting by the Times, the younger Mr. Trump admitted that he attended because he had been promised damaging material about the Hillary Clinton campaign. The Times further reported Monday night that he was informed that any such material was part of a Russian government effort to aid his fathers candidacy.
It will be up to federal prosecutors to determine whether federal conspiracy laws or election laws barring campaigns from soliciting help from foreigners have been implicated. What we already can say is that the plausibility of the Trump camps narrative, in which any underhanded Russian assistance came without the campaigns witting participation, is eroding. The presidents associates must now explain interactions with Russians that they previously insisted never took place.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-trump-campaigns-attempted-collusion/2017/07/10/7841c090-65b0-11e7-8eb5-cbccc2e7bfbf_story.html
Cary
(11,746 posts)Why mince words? How many lies must we be told before we can call liars liars?
BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)It's not a pleasant reality bit people are people. We need to face facts. 30% of us are evil.
I used to walk down the crowded lunch time sidewalk in Chicago and wonder how many of the people I passed would be Hitler if given the chance. Now I know it's every third one.
Maybe Chicago is a little better?
Timmygoat
(779 posts)I just keep thinking 'lock them all up'