Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Supreme Court to consider if citizens have the right not to vote
Joe Helle missed several elections while he was serving in the Army, so Ohio took away his right to vote.
KIRA LERNER
JAN 9, 2018, 11:31 AM
When Ohio resident Joe Helle returned in 2011 from Army tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, he was eager to get back to his community and routine. He had always voted since he was 18, so in August 2011 he went to his polling place where he intended to cast a ballot in a special election for local school issues.
Instead, he was told that his name did not appear on the voter rolls, and was forced to cast a provisional ballot that would not be counted. In November, the same thing occurred when he tried to vote in the general election.
When he contacted Ohios secretary of state, Helle learned of the states policy of purging from the rolls voters who do not participate in federal elections for two years. If voters are found to be inactive for two years, Ohio sends them a mailer to verify their address. If the voter does not respond and does not vote for two more years, he or she is purged from the rolls.
Though Helle requested an absentee ballot while he was in Iraq, he said he cant be sure that the mail ever made its way back to Ohio. And he said he never received the address verification mailer. Because he missed federal elections for several years, he was effectively disenfranchised when he went to the polls in 2011.
More:
https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-ohio-purge-ff8877927396/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1709 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court to consider if citizens have the right not to vote (Original Post)
Judi Lynn
Jan 2018
OP
What a misleading headline. The case is about when and how states can purge voter rolls. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jan 2018
#1
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)1. What a misleading headline. The case is about when and how states can purge voter rolls. n/t
elleng
(130,861 posts)2. Very misleading headline, this is NOT about a 'right' not to vote,
it's about the right TO vote.
'Under Husted, Ohio has been at the forefront among states pushing the myth of fraud. The Republican secretary of state has claimed that President Obamas immigration policies would allow non-citizens to register to vote in Ohio, with lasting implications for the integrity of our elections. Though he has admitted that non-citizen voting is not a major problem, he still insists he has to be extra vigilant because of Ohios position as a critical swing state.'
shraby
(21,946 posts)4. Two years is not long enough to wait before taking anyone off the rolls. Some people only vote
in the presidential elections. This would eliminate them from voting in one.
suston96
(4,175 posts)5. Misleading headline........nt