Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,247 posts)
Sun Jan 28, 2018, 05:35 PM Jan 2018

NASA is going back to the moon if it can figure out how to get there (Achenbach/WaPo)

by Joel Achenbach January 9

NASA is going back to the moon — somehow, someway. The White House has ordered the agency to put American boots back on the lunar surface. The major unknowns at this point include the when, how, scale of the operation and cost. Also unclear is what exactly NASA would accomplish with such a mission and how it might affect plans for a human mission to Mars.
***
“We have no idea yet,” Lightfoot said.

NASA is trying to do this without additional funding or a permanent administrator — another top science position that hasn’t been filled in the Trump administration. NASA’s ongoing challenge in recent years has been reconciling the orders of politicians with the hard realities of flat budgets and the immutable laws of physics. This is the third time this century that NASA has been ordered to make a major shift in the focus of its human spaceflight program.

“We’re always asked to change directions every time we get a new president, and that just causes you to do negative work, work that doesn’t matter,” former astronaut Scott Kelly, who spent nearly a year on the International Space Station in his last spaceflight mission, told The Post. “I just hope someday we’ll have a president that will say, ‘You know what, we’ll just leave NASA on the course they are on, and see what NASA can achieve if we untie their hands.’”

Scott Hubbard, former director of the NASA Ames Research Center, said he has heard grumbling in the space community about this latest change in NASA strategy. He said people are saying, “Please don’t push the reset button again, because you’re just going to waste billions of dollars of previous investment.”
***
more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/01/09/nasa-is-going-back-to-the-moon-if-it-can-figure-out-how-to-get-there/?utm_term=.27d50e7e6aaf

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NASA is going back to the moon if it can figure out how to get there (Achenbach/WaPo) (Original Post) eppur_se_muova Jan 2018 OP
Sounds like something easily entrusted to gut instincts and faith. unblock Jan 2018 #1
Sounds completely safe to me. dewsgirl Jan 2018 #2
Some time ago there was a great lecture posted about going to Mars. rickford66 Jan 2018 #3
Was this Zubrin's Mars Direct approach ? eppur_se_muova Jan 2018 #4
Thanks. It was so logical. rickford66 Jan 2018 #5
"You know what makes your rocket ships go up? Funding. No bucks, no Buck Rogers." Aristus Jan 2018 #6

rickford66

(5,521 posts)
3. Some time ago there was a great lecture posted about going to Mars.
Sun Jan 28, 2018, 06:54 PM
Jan 2018

With the present technology, low cost continuous exploration of Mars is possible. It involved some unique orbital mechanics but no use of the Space Station or a Moon base is needed. They would be unnecessary wastes of time and money. I would love to see it again and I hope someone who reads this can remember seeing it also and finds it again. It was a link here on DU, two to three years ago.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»NASA is going back to the...