Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,379 posts)
Thu Mar 29, 2018, 04:00 PM Mar 2018

TWSJ.: How Tillerson's Exxon Designed an Oil Deal to Skirt Anticorruption Scrutiny

Analysis, not LBN.

Retweeted by David Fahrenthold: https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold

Some damn fine investigative reporting: How Exxon Designed an Oil Deal to Skirt Anticorruption Scrutiny



How Tillerson’s Exxon Designed an Oil Deal to Skirt Anticorruption Scrutiny

The big driller was excited about offshore prospects in west Africa, but worried about ‘issues regarding U.S. anticorruption laws’

By Scott Patterson, Bradley Olson and James V. Grimaldi

https://twitter.com/pattersonscott
scott.patterson@wsj.com

https://twitter.com/bradnews
bradley.olson@wsj.com

https://twitter.com/jamesvgrimaldi

March 29, 2018 11:56 a.m. ET

Negotiators for Exxon Mobil Corp. XOM 2.62% gathered in a London hotel room faced a problem. The government of Liberia suspected that oil rights the energy giant coveted were tainted by corruption. ... It was the winter of 2011, and crude-oil prices were surging. Exxon and then-Chief Executive Rex Tillerson were battling rivals to win access to fresh deposits around the globe. They wanted a deal.

The drilling rights the company sought in Liberia, however, appeared to be linked to former officials from the West African nation, according to internal Exxon documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal and people familiar with the negotiations. An Exxon presentation from the London meeting indicated the company had “concern over issues regarding U.S. anticorruption laws.”

An idea took shape. A Canadian company would buy the rights from a Liberian oil operator whose ownership was murky. Then Exxon would buy a controlling stake in the project from the Canadian outfit, according to the London presentation, documents outlining the deal and people familiar with the matter. Exxon completed the deal for $120 million in 2013.

There is a growing body of U.S. and European laws aimed at stamping out corruption around the world, and they have been aggressively enforced. The Exxon transaction shows the extent to which companies are structuring deals to try to minimize the risks of government scrutiny.
....

Write to Scott Patterson at scott.patterson@wsj.com and Bradley Olson at Bradley.Olson@wsj.com
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TWSJ.: How Tillerson's Exxon Designed an Oil Deal to Skirt Anticorruption Scrutiny (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2018 OP
They sure know how to skirt the law...too bad they never learned out to follow it. Frustratedlady Mar 2018 #1
Trust me, I am from the corporation................... Angry Dragon Mar 2018 #2

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
1. They sure know how to skirt the law...too bad they never learned out to follow it.
Thu Mar 29, 2018, 04:17 PM
Mar 2018

If all these large corporations were closely scrutinized, I'm sure a large percentage of them are doing the same. Once this administration gets kicked out of the WH, most safeguards will have been repealed and the entire corporate community will be a mess to clean up.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»TWSJ.: How Tillerson's Ex...