Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Brett Kavanaugh Once Argued That a Sitting President Is Above the Law & that should be disqualifying
Brett Kavanaugh Once Argued That a Sitting President Is Above the Law--> And that should be disqualifying.
https://www.thenation.com/article/brett-kavanaugh-argued-sitting-president-law/
By John Nichols
Yesterday 10:11 pm
Senator Jeff Merkley was right about the problem with any nomination Donald Trump was going to make for the Supreme Court at this low point in the presidents troubled tenure. A President under investigation should never be allowed to appoint a Justice to the Supreme Court, the Oregon Democrat argued before Trump announced on Monday night that he had selected federal judge Brett Kavanaugh to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Merkleys objection was generally appropriate, in light of the ongoing inquiry by special counsel Robert Mueller into wrongdoing by the presidents associatesand, potentially, Trump himself. But it is especially appropriate with regard to Kavanaugh.
A former staff secretary in the Executive Office of the President of the United States under President George W. Bush, Kavanaugh now serves on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He is a rigid right-wing ideologue who, if confirmed, would move the court far to the right. The president pulled Judge Kavanaughs name from a pre-approved list concocted by radical, far-right special interests that are committed to undermining a womans right to choose, health care protections, safeguards for workers and seniors, LGBTQ rights, and a host of other critical public protections that touch the lives of every New Mexican and every American, explains Senator Tom Udall (D-NM). These extreme groups put Judge Kavanaughs name on their list for a reason.
But believers in the rule of law should be concerned that something else about this nominee appealed to Donald Trump. Kavanaugh has been an open advocate for precisely the sort of imperial presidency that the founders of the American experiment fearedand that Donald Trump relishes.
There is open speculation that Trumps grip on the presidency is threatened by the special counsels investigation. But the high court could avert that threat. And Trump has every reason to believe that his nominee would be could tip the balance of a closely divided court in his favor. As Bloomberg News has noted, Kavanaugh addressed some of the constitutional issues that could emerge from an investigation like Muellers in a 2009 Minnesota Law Review article. What Kavanaugh wrote three years after he assumed his current position on the DC Circuit ought to trouble everyone who believes that the president is a servant of the people, rather than a king for four years.
I believe it vital that the President be able to focus on his never-ending tasks with as few distractions as possible. The country wants the President to be one of us who bears the same responsibilities of citizenship that all share. But I believe that the President should be excused from some of the burdens of ordinary citizenship while serving in office, argued Kavanaugh in the law-review article. He then asserted that the indictment and trial of a sitting President, moreover, would cripple the federal government, rendering it unable to function with credibility in either the international or domestic arenas. Such an outcome would ill serve the public interest, especially in times of financial or national security crisis.
That statement anticipated Rudy Giulianis most over-the-top defenses of President Trump. And, as with Giulianis rants, Kavanaughs arguments reject history, legal precedents, and the logic of a system that is supposed to place the rule of law over the rule of men.
.
Kavanaugh did not always embrace a monarchical interpretation of the presidency. He worked with independent counsel Kenneth Starr during the period leading up to the 1998 impeachment of former President Bill Clinton. But Kavanaugh has since suggested that he was mistaken to believe that the President should be required to shoulder the same obligations that we all carry. .............................
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 952 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post