Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Must-read editorial from @nytimes: Confirmed: Brett Kavanaugh Can't Be Trusted
Senate Democrats
?Verified account @SenateDems
1h1 hour ago
Must-read editorial from @nytimes: Confirmed: Brett Kavanaugh Cant Be Trusted
https://nyti.ms/2NVgYNW?smid=nytcore-ios-share
Link to tweet
Confirmed: Brett Kavanaugh Cant Be Trusted
A perfect nominee for a president with no clear relation to the truth.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/opinion/editorials/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings.html
?quality=90&auto=webp
By The Editorial Board
The editorial board represents the opinions of the board, its editor and the publisher. It is separate from the newsroom and the Op-Ed section.
Sept. 7, 2018
Image
CreditCreditSam Alden
In a more virtuous world, Judge Brett Kavanaugh would be deeply embarrassed by the manner in which he has arrived at the doorstep of a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.
He was nominated by a president who undermines daily the nations democratic order and mocks the constitutional values that Judge Kavanaugh purports to hold dear.
Now hes being rammed through his confirmation process with an unprecedented degree of secrecy and partisan maneuvering by Republican senators who, despite their overflowing praise for his legal acumen and sterling credentials, appear terrified for the American people to find out much of anything about him beyond his penchant for coaching girls basketball.
Perhaps most concerning, Judge Kavanaugh seems to have trouble remembering certain important facts about his years of service to Republican administrations. More than once this week, he testified in a way that appeared to directly contradict evidence in the record.
For example, he testified that Roe v. Wade is settled as a precedent of the Supreme Court. But he said essentially the opposite in a 2003 email leaked to The Times. I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court can always overrule its precedent, and three current Justices on the Court would do so, he wrote then.
Judge Kavanaughs backers in the Senate brushed this off by pointing out that his 2003 statement was factually correct. Theyre right, which means that his testimony this week was both disingenuous and meaningless.
As weve learned with each new trickle of previously withheld documents, Judge Kavanaugh didnt start misleading senators just this week.
At his 2004 confirmation hearing before the Judiciary Committee, he denied any involvement in the vetting of a controversial judicial nominee while serving as one of President George W. Bushs White House lawyers. The nominee, William Pryor Jr., had among other things called Roe v. Wade the worst abomination of constitutional law in our history. In fact, Mr. Kavanaugh was more than a little involved, as emails from that period which Senate Republicans had withheld until early Thursday morning made clear.
...............................................
Judge Kavanaugh was quick to provide lawyerly explanations for all of these discrepancies, but they paint a pattern thats hard to ignore: He misstates facts under oath, and Republicans cover for him by making it hard, if not impossible, to get the documents proving it. With the help of the White House and a personal lawyer for Mr. Bush, Senator Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, has subverted a long-established, nonpartisan process and hidden more than 90 percent of the material pertaining to Judge Kavanaughs time in government.
.........................................
Republicans defend their steamrollering by saying that most Democrats have already made up their minds to oppose Judge Kavanaugh. Thats rich: In the months before the 2016 election, multiple high-ranking Republican senators openly vowed to block any and all Supreme Court picks by Hillary Clinton, period. Its also irrelevant. The people deserve to know everything possible about nominees to a lifetime seat on the highest court in the land, and they depend on their senators to seek out that information and share it.
The Constitution calls this process advice and consent. Until the last few years, Republicans claimed to take that responsibility seriously. Now they are making a mockery of what is meant to be a careful and deliberative process by playing three-card monte with the American people. They did the same with last years tax bill, rushing it through in the dead of night with virtually no debate or review. ....................................
Related
More on Brett Kavanaugh
Opinion | The Editorial Board
The Supreme Court Confirmation Charade
Sept. 1, 2018
Opinion | The Editorial Board
Why Are Republicans Covering Up Brett Kavanaughs Past?
Aug. 17, 2018
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1338 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Must-read editorial from @nytimes: Confirmed: Brett Kavanaugh Can't Be Trusted (Original Post)
riversedge
Sep 2018
OP
yurbud
(39,405 posts)2. that was a stunner