BTRTN: The Op-Ed Goal? Revealing the Flaw in the 25th Amendment
Born To Run The Numbers, with its contrarian view, sees a different reason behind the Op-Ed in The New York Times
http://www.borntorunthenumbers.com/2018/09/the-op-ed-goal-revealing-flaw-in-25th.html
Excerpts: No one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis? Huh? I dont buy this for one second. Cheap Throat uses this justification to rationalize the insurgents decision to not invoke the 25th Amendment, but their solution is to slow-jam a coup...
"Heres a different theory altogether. Perhaps Cheap Throat undertook this entire exercise to educate the population of the United States of America on the profound flaw in the Twenty-Fifth Amendment...
"And this is where the essential flaw in the 25th Amendment becomes apparent. The entire functionality of the amendment rests on the agreement of one person
a person who is inevitably intensely biased by virtue of his or her proximity to the human being who is president and to the presidency itself...
"It is an interesting thesis: that the entire purpose of the Op-ed was to point out the flaw in the 25th Amendment, and then create a situation in which Pence would have the perfect motivation to employ it."
Nitram
(22,791 posts)incapacitated, or planning to have a medical procedure performed, because if he isn't, the bar to override any objection from the president is very high: a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress. Impeachment is the preferred avenue in all other cases.
brush
(53,771 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 11, 2018, 11:55 AM - Edit history (1)
by saving, in their minds, the country from an unfit president.
Ridiculous. If that's not a Constitutional crisis nothing is.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)difficulty in removing an unwilling president using the 25th amendment.