A Wake-Up Call for the G.O.P.
from Mark Sanford, a Republican representative from South Carolina.
'My South Carolina district hadnt voted for a Democrat in 40 years. What happened?
In sports, the team that loses is the team that studies the game-day tapes the hardest. In the military, its called an after-action review. Businesses that dont examine loss die.
But somehow in politics, its different. Too often, political figures simply blame the other side or at least someone besides themselves.
I know this firsthand. In June, after winning three straight elections to the House of Representatives from South Carolina, I lost my primary race to Katie Arrington, who in turn lost last weeks general election to Joe Cunningham, a Democrat. After the general election, Ms. Arrington immediately blamed me for her loss because I did not endorse her.
While its human nature to blame someone, what happened here is far bigger than any postelection spin, given that it has been more than 40 years since a Democrat has held this seat, which runs along South Carolinas coast and leans Republican by 10 points. In fact, there was not a more conservative district in the country to flip to the Democrats.
For this reason, I think the race offers a chance for conservative soul-searching. . .
But three things made this race different things that could prove instructive for Republicans, if we choose to look at them. . .
One, the environment matters to voters. As a party, we have somehow forgotten that conservatism should apply to more than just financial resources. Being conservative should entail being conservative with natural resources, too. . .
As Republicans, weve drifted from our roots. The party, in fact, has a remarkable legacy on conservation and the environment and this race suggests we should recommit ourselves to it.
Two, financial irresponsibility proved a drag. Even in a hyperpartisan world, you still need reasons for traditional conservatives like myself to show up. Its got to be more than the blue team is bad.
One of the underpinnings of the Republican Party has long been financial responsibility, but here, again, the party has drifted. The president has done very little to trim the size of the federal government or entitlement spending . . .
Third, civility is important. What happened to Ronald Reagans notion of being a happy warrior? Like his policies or not, he was pleasant. He smiled. He joked. He played to optimism rather than fear. He and Tip ONeill, the Democratic speaker of the House, had a famously strong working relationship despite their political differences.'>>>
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/13/opinion/a-wake-up-call-for-the-gop.html?
louis-t
(23,292 posts)Yes, that would be a good start.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)I wouldn't hate them all so freaking much.
That said, MARK, we're really not overspending on 'entitlements' ... which are much more properly called "EARNED BUT DEFERRED BENEFITS". They're actually a freaking pittance is the truth. And that 'spending' is actually wonderful for the economy, pouring capital into a myriad of important sectors.
And 'trimming the size of the Federal Government' is not a worthy end in itself. Trimming WASTE is ... but trimming 'just to trim, on principal'? No, that's not a worthy goal. It's a 'talking point', that's all.
Additionally, Obama 'trimmed' (last I read) around 250,000 government jobs during his term. Did that get the GOPpers to love him? Of course not. Then again, all most of them ever 'heard' ... was the exact opposite, despite the actual statistics and facts. But even if they had the facts, it wouldn't have changed how they felt about him.
Bottom-line, the despicable nature of Trump got damn near every Democrat off the couch and to the polls, but didn't inspire as many Republicans to do the same.
Trumps over-the-top dickishness and overall incompetence in terms of the job at hand ... failed to inspire 'your' voters ... like it did 'ours'.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)We earn these things and we are entitled to them. Billionaires are not entitled to steal the benefits that we have earned.
marble falls
(57,079 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)marble falls
(57,079 posts)Cartoonist
(7,316 posts)He still doesn't get it. I didn't read anything there that would turn things around for repubs.
Response to elleng (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
SCantiGOP
(13,869 posts)He is a decent guy, but he is one of the hardcore libertarians in the GOP who, while slightly better than the racist fascist wing of the party, still represent a significant threat to our liberty and values. He honestly believes that government is the problem and that - except for defense, police and a judicial system - the private sector is better at everything than the government can be.
He is basically in the mold of South Carolinians from the 1850s, but with a 'kinder, gentler' dose of racism. They don't hate black people, they just don't give a shit about anyone who is poor or who has suffered in an unfair society that didn't give them the tools to compete with the aristocratic class that he grew up in. They believe that God established society and put the right people in charge, and we will always need an underclass to serve the rulers, so social programs are a waste of time and in no way an ethical endeavor for a free society.
He spoke of growing up on the family farm when he ran for Governor, he just didn't go out of his way to explain that the 'family farm' was a non-productive several thousand acre ex-Plantation.
He isn't evil like Trump or McConnell, he is just a relic of our old pre-FDR society that needs to be put out to pasture.
Midnight Writer
(21,751 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)The GOP is the party of fiscal IRRESPONSIBILITY.
And liars.