Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,765 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 02:14 PM Mar 2019

Commentary: Charges or no, questions can't be left unanswered

By The Washington Post Editorial Board

After nearly two years of waiting, Americans have some preliminary answers about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election. Attorney General William Barr on Sunday revealed that special counsel Robert Mueller found no collusion between Donald Trump or his 2016 campaign with the Russian effort. But Mueller did not answer with the same clarity whether President Trump unduly interfered with law enforcement. That will be a matter for Congress and the public to consider as Barr releases more information; as he must.

Where there is smoke there is not always fire. Despite questionable meetings between Trump officials and Russians, Mueller found that the investigation “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

To take one key example, the June 2016 meeting between Trump’s senior campaign staff and a Russian lawyer was deeply unwise. The campaign should have reported to the FBI the Russian lawyer’s interest in meeting, rather than bringing her into the campaign’s inner sanctum. But, based on Barr’s Sunday summary, this did not reflect a broader coordination between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

That much should be a relief to Americans worried that the nation’s senior leaders acted as agents of a foreign power during the 2016 election. On the other hand, Trump’s bizarre refusal to acknowledge the Russian interference, and his unceasing assaults on Mueller’s investigation, are all the more confounding. It is still not out of the question that Trump’s disturbing deference to Russian President Vladimir Putin is repayment for the Kremlin’s help during the presidential race. But it seems more likely that Trump is simply a Russian apologist. That is not comforting.

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/commentary-charges-or-no-questions-cant-be-left-unanswered/?utm_source=DAILY+HERALD&utm_campaign=612745b095-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d81d073bb4-612745b095-228635337

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Commentary: Charges or no, questions can't be left unanswered (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2019 OP
"have some preliminary answers" - Bullshit. We have a Trump crony's OPINIONS. lagomorph777 Mar 2019 #1

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
1. "have some preliminary answers" - Bullshit. We have a Trump crony's OPINIONS.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 03:58 PM
Mar 2019

And an even bigger pile of questions than we had before Barr opened his orange-rimmed mouth.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Commentary: Charges or no...