Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,857 posts)
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 12:13 AM Dec 2019

Trump's demands for NATO is a 'very rough way to play,' a former top commander of the alliance says.

'President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning threw cold water on one of the founding principles of the NATO by suggesting the US may not defend a fellow member if it came under attack. . .

During his meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at the NATO summit in London, Trump was asked by reporters if he would adhere to Article 5 — a principle described as being "at the very heart of NATO's founding treaty."

"I'm going to be discussing that today, and it's a very interesting question, isn't it?" Trump told reporters. He made the remarks in light of his assertions that some NATO members are "delinquent" in meeting a goal to each spend 2% of GDP on defense by 2024.

That part of the treaty, which has only been invoked once, after the US was attacked on September 11, 2001, requires members to "protect each other" if one is attacked and states that "an attack against one Ally is considered as an attack against all Allies."

Retired US Army Gen. Wesley Clark, a former Supreme Allied Commander Europe who oversaw all NATO military forces on the continent, warned that the potential walk-back of Article 5 could endanger the US and its allies.

"This is a very rough way to play with NATO's fundamental commitment," Clark told Business Insider. "It undercuts deterrence, encourages potential adversaries, and erodes NATO itself."

"It invites others to play the same way, as [Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan] is now doing by threatening Baltic defense plans unless he gets his way with the Kurds," Clark added, referring to the Turkish-backed offensive against the Kurds in northeast Syria in October.'>>>

https://www.businessinsider.com/nato-trump-spending-wesley-clark-treaty-article-5-2019-12

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's demands for NATO is a 'very rough way to play,' a former top commander of the alliance says. (Original Post) elleng Dec 2019 OP
presumes he even knows what article 5 is nt msongs Dec 2019 #1
Well he is fronting for Vlad and Tayyip so all's fair in love and war, right? Ford_Prefect Dec 2019 #2
I have little doubt whose side Trump would be on if Russia invaded a NATO country. world wide wally Dec 2019 #3

world wide wally

(21,740 posts)
3. I have little doubt whose side Trump would be on if Russia invaded a NATO country.
Wed Dec 4, 2019, 10:23 AM
Dec 2019

Trump and Tucker Carlson.
And deplorables are just so many sheep.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump's demands for NATO ...