Hundreds of 'pink slime' local news outlets spread algorithmic stories & conservative talking points

[swag]

https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/hundreds-of-pink-slime-local-news-outlets-are-distributing-algorithmic-stories-conservative-talking-points.php

Columbia Journalism Review

By Priyanjana Bengani

DECEMBER 18, 2019

An increasingly popular tactic challenges conventional wisdom on the spread of electoral disinformation: the creation of partisan outlets masquerading as local news organizations. An investigation by the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia Journalism School has discovered at least 450 websites in a network of local and business news organizations, each distributing thousands of algorithmically generated articles and a smaller number of reported stories. Of the 450 sites we discovered, at least 189 were set up as local news networks across ten states within the last twelve months by an organization called Metric Media.

Titles like the East Michigan News, Hickory Sun, and Grand Canyon Times have appeared on the web ahead of the 2020 election. These networks of sites can be used in a variety of ways: as ‘stage setting’ for events, focusing attention on issues such as voter fraud and energy pricing, providing the appearance of neutrality for partisan issues, or to gather data from users that can then be used for political targeting.

On October 20, the Lansing State Journal first broke the story of the network’s existence. About three dozen local news sites, owned by Metric Media, had appeared in Michigan. Further reporting by the Michigan Daily, the Guardian and the New York Times identified yet more sites. Ultimately, previous reporting has identified around 200 of these sites. Our analysis suggests that there are at least twice that number of publications across a number of related networks, of which Metric Media is just one component.

Over a two-week period starting November 26, we tapped into the RSS feeds of these 189 Metric Media sites, all of which were created this year, and found over fifteen thousand unique stories had been published (over fifty thousand when aggregated across the sites), but only about a hundred titles had the bylines of human reporters. The rest cited automated services or press releases.

. . . more

[erronis]

1. Excellent reference to the CJR analysis.

This is not our grand-dads' AP or UPI.

[stopdiggin]

2. So. Obvious question. Who is setting up, and financing

these sites? They didn't spring up out of the ground organically.

[CaptYossarian]

3. So Sinclair has competition. Just what we need. Another one.

Screw 'em. Do your research and boycott their advertisers. And write to those advertisers to inform them of the boycott. Money talks.

[DanieRains]

4. Can The Center Hold?

Between Russia, Voter Suppression, Deep Fake videos, Fox spewing lies and distortions 24/7, Hate Radio, and a billionaire favoring MSM how can the center hold?

We need to overwhelm the status quo.

[lastlib]

5. Salient point is that none of these players are interested in telling the truth!

Objectivity is NOT in the vocabulary. There has to be a countervailing force against these, or we, the people will be (if not already) totally overwhelmed with right-wing-aligned falsehood!

I am reminded of the quote from Milton's Areopagitica: "...so Truth be in the field, let her and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the worse in an open encounter?"

Well, so much for THAT idea..........

[SpankMe]

6. Wow - this is important

It's a new level of psyops (psychological operations) of the right being brought to bear on the public.

I wish there was a current list of all of these sites so I could see which of my local sites are pink slime sites and warn everyone around me.

[mdbl]

7. Most of facebook and twitter are Pink Slime to me,,

and the orange slime that is also on twitter.