I was in charge of Mt. Rushmore. Trump's plan for fireworks there is a terrible idea.
It has been more than 10 years since fireworks were last seen at Mount Rushmore National Memorial. The fireworks were canceled in 2010, my first year as superintendent of the memorial, and they never resumed during my tenure. While such patriotic celebrations were memorable, they also endangered public safety and irreplaceable natural and cultural resources within the national park and surrounding area.
Yet this year, President Trump and his administration, with the support of South Dakota Gov. Kristi L. Noem, have insisted on resuming the fireworks on July 3. And the Interior Department, under Secretary David Bernhardt, is allowing this to happen, overlooking the well-documented danger this event presents.
Several concerns drove the sound decision to cancel the fireworks in 2010. In case of emergency wildfires started by the fireworks, medical emergencies or extreme weather events evacuation of visitors could prove tremendously difficult. The anticipated traffic congestion and gridlock could last for hours before and after the event, compounded by visitors who are not familiar with the area. Furthermore, chemicals in the groundwater caused by perchlorates from fireworks is a concern to the health and safety of visitors and employees. A recent analysis of water and soil samples from the memorial found contamination an order of magnitude higher than sites measured outside the memorial; the analysis also stated that further fireworks events would increase contamination levels. This is an unacceptable outcome.
And this year, resuming the fireworks demonstration is an even greater threat to both humans and nature. Thanks to an extremely dry summer, South Dakota faces a higher than usual risk of wildfires. A former fire management officer for Mount Rushmore and numerous national parks warned that the fireworks show would be ill-advised given the dry conditions. The National Park Service has heeded similar warnings in previous years, canceling the fireworks in 2002 and 2010 at least in part because of high fire danger. And the park service has continued to cite concern over devastating wildfires as a reason for discontinuing the event until now.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/07/01/danger-fireworks-mount-rushmore/
CanonRay
(14,085 posts)Faux pas
(14,645 posts)And
2naSalit
(86,332 posts)What a, you know, I can't come up with words to describe the level of vile in this situation.
niyad
(113,074 posts)2naSalit
(86,332 posts)intervene somehow.
niyad
(113,074 posts)tclambert
(11,084 posts)Problem solved. Putting out a wildfire? Saving visitors from the wildfire? Trump will deny responsibility for that, too. He'll hop on Marine One and fly safely away. He'll be safe and Republicans won't hold him accountable for mass deaths and mayhem, so bring on the next pep rally!