As pandemic benefits expire, Senate Republicans and Trump can't get their act together
IT HAS been slightly more than four months since Congress and President Trump met what was still an incipient coronavirus pandemic with $2.7 trillion worth of economic and health-care support. Passage of the Cares Act in late March, by overwhelming consensus of what is usually a bitterly polarized and divided legislature, represented hopeful evidence that American democracy could still function when it really had to.
At least that was our evaluation then; recent events in Washington, though, cause us to reconsider. Progress against the pandemic has faded and, in some places, turned into regression. As a result, the economic recovery has stalled, just as we were warned it would. Yet Congress and the president are deadlocked on a new round of urgently needed economic support. The immediate consequences are likely to be worst for those least able to withstand them: the expiration, at midnight Friday, of both a $600-per-week federal supplement to unemployment insurance and a moratorium on evictions.
The main problem is disarray among Republicans, who have wasted precious time debating a counterproposal to the $3 trillion Heroes Act that the Democratic House passed months ago. There are differences within the Senate GOP and between the Senate GOP and Mr. Trump. The latest intra-GOP flap arose when the White House contradicted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnells (R-Ky.) long-standing demand that any bill must include liability protections for businesses and universities that reopen.
This has to stop. The Cares Act was not only a symbolic victory for the political process, it was a substantive one, too. The billions of dollars in aid to households, through additional unemployment insurance or direct payments, coupled with the Paycheck Protection Program for small businesses, have so far protected vulnerable families from what otherwise would have been catastrophic economic losses. In fact, personal disposable income actually rose in the second quarter of 2020, even as the economy shrank at an annual rate of 32.9 percent. Ideally, Congress would produce a new bill that modified what was inevitably imperfect about the Cares Act and included funds to help state and local governments. Especially urgent within aid to the states would be generous financial support for the November elections. As important as it is to salvage the economy, it might be even more vital to salvage the legitimacy of the vote.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/as-pandemic-benefits-expire-senate-republicans-and-trump-cant-get-their-act-together/2020/07/31/cf05c7c2-d354-11ea-8c55-61e7fa5e82ab_story.html
appalachiablue
(41,124 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)While trump wanted us to get zero, and starve us back to work while a deadly pandemic is raging out control . This is already backfiring on them and more people are running from them now, and turning more states blue. Now trump wants to force children and teachers back to school while the virus is setting records for new cases and deaths daily. That's going to cost them many more votes. Sending kids and teachers back now is doomed for failure , and permanent harm to these children for the rest of their lives, and whose going to pay their medical bills from this?