Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
J. Michael Luttig: No, President Trump can't pardon himself
Hey, this guy went to law school and everything. So listen up.
As always, this opinion piece and $4 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks.
Opinions
No, President Trump cant pardon himself
Opinion by J. Michael Luttig
Dec. 7, 2020 at 7:10 p.m. EST
J. Michael Luttig served as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals (1991-2006) and as assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department (1990-1991).
{snip}
So why is it clear that the president lacks the power to pardon himself? There are three reasons. The language of the pardon power itself is ambiguous in the face of a constitutional expectation of clarity if the Framers intended to invest the president with such extraordinary power a power in the sovereign that was little known to the Framers, if known at all.
Second, the Framers clearly contemplated in the impeachment provisions of the Constitution that the president would not be able to violate the criminal laws with impunity. There, without so much as a hint of a presidents power to avoid criminal liability through self-pardon, they provided that even in Cases of Impeachment, for which the president can only be removed and disqualified from holding high federal office, the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
And last, but not least, a power in the president to pardon himself for any and all crimes against the United States he committed would grievously offend the animating constitutional principle that no man, not even the president, is above and beyond the law.
In contemporary constitutional parlance, the Framers more likely would have regarded a self-pardon not as an act of justice, grace, mercy and forgiveness, as they did presidential pardons of others. They would have viewed a self-pardon as a presidential act more akin to an obstruction of justice for criminal offenses against the United States by a president, the prosecution for which can be brought, at least according to the Justice Department, only after a president leaves office.
{snip}
No, President Trump cant pardon himself
Opinion by J. Michael Luttig
Dec. 7, 2020 at 7:10 p.m. EST
J. Michael Luttig served as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals (1991-2006) and as assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department (1990-1991).
{snip}
So why is it clear that the president lacks the power to pardon himself? There are three reasons. The language of the pardon power itself is ambiguous in the face of a constitutional expectation of clarity if the Framers intended to invest the president with such extraordinary power a power in the sovereign that was little known to the Framers, if known at all.
Second, the Framers clearly contemplated in the impeachment provisions of the Constitution that the president would not be able to violate the criminal laws with impunity. There, without so much as a hint of a presidents power to avoid criminal liability through self-pardon, they provided that even in Cases of Impeachment, for which the president can only be removed and disqualified from holding high federal office, the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
And last, but not least, a power in the president to pardon himself for any and all crimes against the United States he committed would grievously offend the animating constitutional principle that no man, not even the president, is above and beyond the law.
In contemporary constitutional parlance, the Framers more likely would have regarded a self-pardon not as an act of justice, grace, mercy and forgiveness, as they did presidential pardons of others. They would have viewed a self-pardon as a presidential act more akin to an obstruction of justice for criminal offenses against the United States by a president, the prosecution for which can be brought, at least according to the Justice Department, only after a president leaves office.
{snip}
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1695 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
J. Michael Luttig: No, President Trump can't pardon himself (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2020
OP
musclecar6
(1,685 posts)1. I agree
That said, we know its likely this asshole is going to try it.
Polybius
(15,385 posts)2. He almost became a Supreme Court Justice
He was on W's short list both times, but passed over for Roberts and Alito.
SWBTATTReg
(22,112 posts)3. Best explanation I've read on this ... thanks for providing it!
alwaysinasnit
(5,065 posts)4. k&r for visibility
My Pet Orangutan
(9,238 posts)5. Disagree - the pardon power was a direct cut and paste
from the Royal Prerogative of English Kings. The impeachment exception was carved out by Parliament during the reign of Charles II.
The prerogative is by nature a sovereign power. Hamilton inserted the unfettered power of a Monarch into the constitution.
elleng
(130,865 posts)6. Interesting.