If Trump pardons himself, Biden should un-pardon him
Opinion by Ken Gormley
Ken Gormley is an expert on the Constitution, the presidency and the pardon power. He is president of Duquesne University.
If President Trump makes the ill-advised decision to try to pardon himself before he leaves the White House in January, incoming president Joe Biden should respond with another unprecedented step: He should un-pardon his predecessor.
That might sound strange, even extra-constitutional. Certainly, theres nothing in the words of the Constitution or in historical precedent that speaks of undoing a self-pardon but thats because theres nothing that authorizes a self-pardon in the first place. The Constitutions text, its original meaning and historical precedent all point strongly against the validity of a self-pardon.
In part because its unlikely that the legitimacy of such an audacious act would be determined in court, its important for the new president, with the advice of his Justice Department, to take a stand against this dangerous precedent.
The Framers of the Constitution gave the chief executive enormous discretion in wielding pardons. Presidents have used this sprawling power to pardon political allies (George H.W. Bush pardoned former defense secretary Caspar Weinberger), and even family members (President Bill Clinton pardoned his half-brother, Roger Clinton). The pardon power permits the president to pardon individuals of all past federal crimes, and even crimes that have not been specified. If Trump chooses to pardon his children or any other person within his orbit, he can do it.
But no president has ever tried to issue a self-pardon, for good reason. Taking a pardon for oneself constitutes an act of self-dealing, running counter to the clear text that says presidents can grant pardons, which implies a grant to others. It also runs counter to the landmark holding of United States v. Nixon, the Watergate tapes case, in which Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote for a unanimous court that not even the president is above the law.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/12/18/if-trump-pardons-himself-biden-should-un-pardon-him/
NCjack
(10,279 posts)uberblonde
(1,215 posts)They'll accept anything they think helps them win.
uberblonde
(1,215 posts)They'll accept anything they think helps them win.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,722 posts)Because accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt.. There is much Trump is guilty of.
dutch777
(2,963 posts)...with a pardon, he no longer gets to say he didn't do it.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,548 posts)If Trump was indicted on any federal charge, he would be arraigned in court, and would have to assert his self pardon as cause for dismissal. It would certainly be set aside and prosecution would proceed. (Certainly Trump could appeal all the way to SCOTUS, be he would lose every step of the way, as a self pardon would give one the power to assassinate at will, including judges, with the only potential consequences being impeachment)
Shoonra
(518 posts)`In the 1798 Convention for Virginia to ratify the Constitution, Madison said that the President could be impeached for granting pardons to his accomplices in a crime. Because the penalties for impeachment include the possibility of denial of any future government office, even after a govt official leaves office he could still be impeached with a view toward disqualifying him from any other office.
So, if Trump pardons himself, he could be impeached - even after he leaves the White House - and, if convicted, be prohibited from holding any other federal office.
There have been contradictory law review articles on whether a President could pardon himself; I suspect he could -- but it would bring an impeachment down on him.