Fake GOP rage over Biden's 'unity' speech is a sucker's game
Opinion by Greg Sargent
President Biden declared in his inaugural address that our prospects for much-needed unity are threatened by various political forces. Among them, he said, are racism, nativism, political extremism, white supremacy and domestic terrorism.
Republicans promptly decided that in condemning those things, Biden was actually talking about them.
Republican officials and their media allies are now widely condemning these words as an attack on themselves and their voters. The obvious trick is to game the media into saying Biden is already reneging on his unity promise by being divisive.
But theres a deeper ploy here. With this new fake outrage fest, Republicans are working to reframe the national debate over how to repair the damage done during Donald Trumps presidency on terms favorable to them.
This reframing is designed to bury their own culpability for the injuries they inflicted by actively enabling Trump and by deliberately harnessing the destructive forces he unleashed toward their own instrumental ends.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/01/21/gop-response-biden-speech-unity/
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)Let them wallow in it ALONE.
canuckledragger
(1,636 posts)Given their uncountable examples over the past few years of everything he stated.
It's false outrage alright. They don't like their actions exposed to daylight for all to see.
HariSeldon
(455 posts)Republicans could have repudiated racism, white supremacy, sexism, etc. and said, "While we won't agree with President Biden or Congressional Democrats on every aspect of what our nation needs, we will work to find common ground and represent the voice of the conservative viewpoint in American politics." Instead, they chose to hang these identifiers around their own necks, trying to claim it was Biden who had done it.
My question is whether Democrats can get people to see through this dissembling.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)put themselves into being one or more of what Biden mentioned.
When they accuse his speech as being divisive, thy should be asked to select which one(s) they see as themselves ( racist, nativist, political extremist, white supremacist and/or domestic terrorist)
Marcuse
(7,479 posts)As when Lauren Boebert assumed Sean Maloney implied she was complicit in terrorism, the lady doth protest too much.