Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
Fri Jan 7, 2022, 02:43 PM Jan 2022

Chief justice: Judges must better avoid financial conflicts

JESSICA GRESKO
January 1, 2022, 11:46 AM


WASHINGTON (AP) — Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts says the federal judiciary needs to do more to ensure judges don't participate in cases where they have financial conflicts of interest.

Roberts made the comments as part of his annual report on the federal judiciary released Friday evening.

Roberts pointed to a series of stories recently in The Wall Street Journal that found that “between 2010 and 2018, 131 federal judges participated in a total of 685 matters involving companies in which they or their families owned shares of stock.” Federal judges and Supreme Court justices are required under a federal ethics law to recuse themselves from cases where they have a personal financial interest.

“Let me be crystal clear: the Judiciary takes this matter seriously. We expect judges to adhere to the highest standards, and those judges violated an ethics rule,” Roberts wrote in the nine-page report.
https://www.aol.com/news/chief-justice-judges-must-better-230100308-174654118.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr


( The irony could choke a horse. )

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chief justice: Judges must better avoid financial conflicts (Original Post) BeckyDem Jan 2022 OP
Shall we start w/ Kavanaugh ? jaysunb Jan 2022 #1
what is he thinking, the whole point behind conservative "smaller gov't" is so that they Thomas Hurt Jan 2022 #2
Amazing, isn't it? I mean, duh. BeckyDem Jan 2022 #3
I reckon since Ginny Thomas is a well paid employee of Charles Koch, Clarence needs to step down. Midnight Writer Jan 2022 #4
+1 BeckyDem Jan 2022 #6
Well, I'm sure they will hop right on that, given that strongly worded statement with Scrivener7 Jan 2022 #5
Citizens United champion at that...yea, why worry about the influence of money??? BeckyDem Jan 2022 #7
Nailed it. twodogsbarking Jan 2022 #8

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
2. what is he thinking, the whole point behind conservative "smaller gov't" is so that they
Fri Jan 7, 2022, 02:54 PM
Jan 2022

can exploit the gov't to line their own pockets and do favors, and get their nephews and nieces nice gigs.

Midnight Writer

(21,717 posts)
4. I reckon since Ginny Thomas is a well paid employee of Charles Koch, Clarence needs to step down.
Fri Jan 7, 2022, 04:00 PM
Jan 2022

There is rarely an issue that Koch and his organizations don't take a side on.

"Ginny! I got recusin' to do!"

Scrivener7

(50,918 posts)
5. Well, I'm sure they will hop right on that, given that strongly worded statement with
Fri Jan 7, 2022, 04:07 PM
Jan 2022

absolutely nothing to back it up.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Chief justice: Judges mus...