NPR holds master class in confronting Trump, Big Lie
By Margaret Sullivan / The Washington Post
How can journalists interview Donald Trump or other politicians who consistently spread misinformation without magnifying their lies? Its been a challenge, and a problem, for years.
One answer arrived Wednesday when NPR aired its long-sought chat with the former president, conducted a day earlier by Steve Inskeep, a host of Morning Edition. The interview has drawn plenty of attention because Trump abruptly ended the call after nine minutes, cutting short what was planned as a 15-minute chat.
So Steve, thank you very much, Trump said, mid-conversation and without warning, after attempting to deflect or ignore some of Inskeeps questions. I appreciate it. With that, he hung up.
But to me, the interview was less notable for its sudden ending than for what it accomplished. Although noncombative in tone, it still managed to give listeners an accurate picture of the subject matter: Trumps insistence on promoting an evidence-free and thoroughly debunked argument that the 2020 election was rigged and that he should have been granted a second term as the rightful winner.
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-npr-holds-master-class-in-confronting-trump-big-lie/
MyOwnPeace
(16,923 posts)It is nice to actually have someone in the 'industry' asking the same questions we've been asking: "Why don't you do your job!?"
Beartracks
(12,806 posts)murielm99
(30,724 posts)I hope everyone takes the time to go to the link and read the entire article.
Truth Sandwiches! Yum!