A Texas Judge Just Took Religious 'Freedom' Too Far
Bloomberg Opinion
@opinion
Last week, a federal district court held that a Christian employer is entitled to an exemption from the requirement that all insurance plans must cover pre-exposure prophylaxis (PreP) drugs that prevent the spread of HIV
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
A Texas Judge Just Took Religious Freedom Too Far
A federal district court ruling that holds a Christian employer can stop offering health insurance covering anti-HIV drugs deserves more attention.
Bloomberg Opinion @opinion
The courts decision, under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), seems to resemble the exemption from the Affordable Care Acts mandatory contraceptive coverage that the Supreme Court granted in the 2014 Hobby Lobby case
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
If upheld by the appellate court and the Supreme Court, the ruling would exempt an employer who refused to provide health-care coverage of any kind on the ground that medical insurance encourages people to rely on medical science in planning their lives https://trib.al/URKXZcb
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
Replying to
@opinion
How important is this case? You have to go back to 2014.
Thats when Hobby Lobby claimed its religious liberty was burdened by providing insurance for contraception. It considers contraception religiously wrong
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
In the new case, Braidwood claimed its religious exercise was substantially burdened because providing PreP drugs encourage homosexual behavior, prostitution, sexual promiscuity and intravenous drug use https://trib.al/URKXZcb
Under the new ruling, anyone who wants to avoid almost any provision of federal law would be able to say that obeying the law would enable behavior that his religion disfavors
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
The Department of Health and Human Services argued Braidwoods claim was based on an empirical assertion, namely that these medicines facilitate gay and extramarital sex.
HHS said Braidwood should have to prove its fact-based claim about the world
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
The court sharply rejected HHSs position.
Defendants [HHS] inappropriately contest the correctness of Braidwoods beliefs, the court wrote, when courts may test only the sincerity of those beliefs
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
The long-run consequences of accepting all asserted religious liberty claims is that there is no logical stopping place
for what valid religious liberty claims can be made for religious exemptions from federal law
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
Exemptions to prevent forcing people to personally violate their own religious beliefs are one thing.
Exemptions dreamt up to drive a broader set of social-religious objectives are another
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=s2hW0dtfA4SkZzfSiAdJFQ
A Texas Judge Just Took Religious Freedom Too Far
A federal district court ruling that holds a Christian employer can stop offering health insurance covering anti-HIV drugs deserves more attention.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-09-14/texas-prep-drug-ruling-in-braidwood-case-should-be-overturned?sref=sxorlmMs&leadSource=uverify%20wall
Noah Feldman September 14, 2022 at 7:30 AM CDT
Listen to this article
The long march of religious liberty exemptions is gaining speed. The people who brought you contraceptive care exemptions and Covid rule and vaccine exemptions have now moved on to insurance for anti-HIV drugs. Last week, a federal district court held that a Christian employer is entitled to an exemption from the requirement that all insurance plans must cover pre-exposure prophylaxis (PreP) drugs that prevent the spread of HIV................
dchill
(38,320 posts)These creeps have the right to infect, sicken and kill us all in the service of their golden idols. God damn them.
magicarpet
(13,937 posts)Just exactly what Jeebuzz extolled on a daily basis - taught and preached near and far.
The sick,
The ill,
The less fortunate,
Fuck 'em.
unblock
(51,974 posts)Their religious belief is that anyone who doesn't behave exactly how we and our minority interpretation of what our god wants them to behave deserves to suffer and die, and they gave the right to use government to enforce their religious edicts.
They are everything they wailed about regarding sharia law and death panels and so on. But they call it Christianity instead of Islam so it's holy instead of evil.
msongs
(67,193 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,362 posts)Next... a religious exemption to not cover Jews, Muslims, other non-Christians and certainly not the 'wrong' kind of Christians.
chowmama
(396 posts)No modern medicine at all? Just prayer?