Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,900 posts)
Thu Mar 2, 2023, 03:51 PM Mar 2023

The Case That Could Ban the Abortion Pill Nationwide Is in the Hands of the Worst Possible Judge

Abortion advocates are waiting for a ruling in a lawsuit filed in Texas that could result in the main abortion drug being pulled from the market nationwide. (Such a ruling wouldn’t end all medication abortions, but it would create more confusion and hurdles for patients and providers.) A group of anti-abortion activists filed the suit in a specific federal court district where there is only one judge: Matthew Kacsmaryk. As we learn more about the judge, it’s no surprise why the Christian legal movement specifically chose to play this out on his turf.

A Washington Post story published Saturday explored the extent of the devout Christian’s conservative, anti-abortion beliefs. Kacsmaryk was raised by two born-again Christians near Fort Worth, Texas, and his mother worked with so-called “crisis pregnancy centers.” When his sister got pregnant at 17, she went to live at an anti-abortion maternity home until she gave birth and put the baby up for adoption. Kacsmaryk then served on the board of the maternity home from January 2016 until Donald Trump nominated him for a federal judgeship, but he and his wife are still donors, per the Post. At the time of his 2017 nomination, Kacsmaryk worked as deputy general counsel at the First Liberty Institute, a Christian legal organization. He worked there until his Senate confirmation in June 2019.

Kacsmaryk also has deep connections to the conservative Federalist Society, which have not been previously reported. President Donald Trump picked all three of his Supreme Court justices from a Federalist Society-vetted list that was personally curated by the group’s former executive vice president and current co-chairman of the board, Leonard Leo. The Post reported that Kacsmaryk attended meetings in law school and remains “affiliated” with the group, but that doesn’t adequately describe his ties; Kacsmaryk actually co-founded the Fort Worth, Texas, chapter of the Federalist Society and has spoken at least 10 of its events, most recently in New Orleans on Friday, February 24—the same day final briefs were due in the abortion pill case.

Leo himself has financial ties to the firm where Kacsmaryk worked immediately before becoming a judge. After Trump first nominated Kacsmaryk in 2017, First Liberty Institute began paying the Leo-aligned firm CRC Advisors over $100,000 a year. At a February 2020 meeting, First Liberty Institute president and CEO Kelly Shackelford bragged about the wide-ranging effort staged by various groups to influence Trump’s selections for federal judges. “Some of us literally opened a whole operation on judicial nominations and vetting,” he said. “We poured millions of dollars into this to make sure the president has good information, he picks the best judges.”

https://www.yahoo.com/news/case-could-ban-abortion-pill-174000797.html

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Case That Could Ban the Abortion Pill Nationwide Is in the Hands of the Worst Possible Judge (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2023 OP
Can we not find a judge somewhere to rule that the "founders": Thunderbeast Mar 2023 #1
Judges have no enforcement authority over their rulings. Biden should issue an EO giving in2herbs Mar 2023 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Rebl2 Mar 2023 #4
EO & MCD Whatthe_Firetruck Mar 2023 #5
EO Executive Order MCD typo. Should be MCI, mild cognitive impairment. nt in2herbs Mar 2023 #6
States should just ignore the ruling. Elessar Zappa Mar 2023 #3
In all likelihood his sister wanted to keep and raise the baby but wasn't allowed to. StevieM Mar 2023 #7

Thunderbeast

(3,406 posts)
1. Can we not find a judge somewhere to rule that the "founders":
Thu Mar 2, 2023, 04:26 PM
Mar 2023

Intended to keep abortion legal?

Outlaw assault weapons?

Declare that money is not speech?

Two Dakotas are redundant?

Base the decision on the fact that the current Supreme Court is clearly corrupt and illegitimate!

Since there is no legitimate arbitrator of such matters in the judiciary, let the final decision be made by an ad hoc panel of smart people...let's say for example:

Rachael Maddow
Hillary Clinton
Barack Obama
Keith Olberman
Andy Borowitz (just to keep it light)

If they get to cherry-pick courts to meet their ideology, I want to pick MY decision makers and impose MY will on the rest of the country.

in2herbs

(2,945 posts)
2. Judges have no enforcement authority over their rulings. Biden should issue an EO giving
Thu Mar 2, 2023, 04:35 PM
Mar 2023

absolute immunity to anyone who mfgs., insures, and dispenses these drugs if banned. Let the states and Rs challenge the EO. The chances are nil that the USSC will render any decision that will hurt corporations.

Alito who started all this is suffering with MCD, a step not far from Alzh. If his wife has any love for him she'd force him to retire before he starts drooling from the bench.

Response to in2herbs (Reply #2)

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
7. In all likelihood his sister wanted to keep and raise the baby but wasn't allowed to.
Sat Mar 4, 2023, 01:56 AM
Mar 2023

These people are not just anti-abortion--they are also anti-parenting when the woman is unmarried.

They believe there should be absolutely no sex outside of heterosexual marriage and that EVERY SINGLE CHILD born out of wedlock should be given up for adoption.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Case That Could Ban t...