HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Editorials & Other Articles (Forum) » Why Steve Bannon May Stil...

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 06:12 AM

Why Steve Bannon May Still Go Down for a Pardoned Crime

When President Donald Trump pardoned Steve Bannon in the closing hours of his presidency, it seemed like the right-wing media personality—and once chief strategist for Trump—had successfully evaded any repercussions for his involvement in a scheme that sent some of his partners to prison.

Double jeopardy laws, of course, prevent someone from being prosecuted twice for the same crime.

But there’s a curious reason why Bannon can’t raise the double jeopardy defense before his upcoming state court trial and make the case disappear: New Yorkers saw this coming.

“The law changed in New York, specifically because Trump started handing out pardons. New York State took the position that these people need to be answerable to crimes they committed in New York State,” explained Diane Peress, an adjunct lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

It all comes down to the way former federal prosecutor Todd Kaminsky, then a Long Island state senator, noticed how Trump was “corruptly using the pardon power” to shield himself by saving his powerful friends.



https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-steve-bannon-may-still-go-down-for-a-pardoned-crime

10 replies, 2922 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 10 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why Steve Bannon May Still Go Down for a Pardoned Crime (Original post)
douglas9 Jun 2023 OP
SouthernDem4ever Jun 2023 #1
Lochloosa Jun 2023 #2
SouthernDem4ever Jun 2023 #8
dem4decades Jun 2023 #3
FBaggins Jun 2023 #4
dem4decades Jun 2023 #6
FBaggins Jun 2023 #7
Elessar Zappa Jun 2023 #9
FBaggins Jun 2023 #10
republianmushroom Jun 2023 #5

Response to douglas9 (Original post)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 06:37 AM

1. Dump's use of the presidential pardon was reprehensible

Our laws need to be changed and constitution amended so this no longer happens. How many presidential pardons have we seen go to deserving people? You can probably count them on one hand.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to SouthernDem4ever (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 06:47 AM

2. I disagree. The orange Jesus did abuse his power but it's not always that way.

Elections have consequences.

Barack Obama has now commuted the sentences of more than 1,000 people in prison for drug crimes
https://qz.com/844035/barack-obama-has-now-commuted-the-sentences-of-more-than-1000-people-in-prison-for-drug-crimes


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lochloosa (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 07:16 PM

8. We shouldn't have to use presidential pardons for bad laws

We need a house and senate that will do it's job properly.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to douglas9 (Original post)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 06:58 AM

3. Bannon was found guilty of a crime and to this day is not in prison, without a pardon. If

anybody thinks he's going to jail for a pardoned crime they need their heads examined.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dem4decades (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 07:31 AM

4. That's an entirely different situation

He was convicted of a misdemeanor that came with a 4-month sentence. He obviously wouldn't start serving that sentence if there's a year+ appeal going on.

That appeal just had a DOJ response a couple of days ago.

If the DC Circuit had rejected the appeal then he would have gone to prison last year and his sentence would already be over by now.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FBaggins (Reply #4)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 02:59 PM

6. Why do minority defendants stay in prison before trial or go directly to jail upon being found guilt

You are correct, justice is different,. for the connected

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dem4decades (Reply #6)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 04:25 PM

7. They don't

A federal nonviolent misdemeanor with a maximum sentence of a year almost never gets pretrial confinement and is almost always allowed to stay out pending appeal to a circuit court.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FBaggins (Reply #7)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 07:42 PM

9. You doubt that minorities are treated differently in our justice system?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Elessar Zappa (Reply #9)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 09:06 PM

10. Did I say that?

Nope - it had nothing to do with whether justice is sometimes partial/impartial based on race. It was simply that Bannon is not an example of that in this regard - because nobody else would be held for a year awaiting an appeal of a four month sentence. Color has nothing to do with it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to douglas9 (Original post)

Mon Jun 5, 2023, 01:28 PM

5. He should. IMO

One has to wonder, did he pay the 2 million, in cash or easy payments.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread