Screwing Over Urban America: Why the GOP's Top Contenders Hate Cities
http://www.alternet.org/news/153644/screwing_over_urban_america%3A_why_the_gop%27s_top_contenders_hate_cities/The Republican presidential primary has covered significant ground. Against a backdrop of Iowan cornfields, candidates have debated socialism, capitalism, immigration and American exceptionalism, and have even touched on the finer points of Shariah law and the Federalist Papers. One thing you dont hear about is Americas cities and the ongoing, and growing, urban crisis.
There are some oblique references, like Newt Gingrichs suggestion that child labor laws be modified so that poor children can work as school janitors. Really poor children in really poor neighborhoods, mused Gingrich, have no habits of working and have nobody around them who works They have no habit of I do this and you give me cash, unless its illegal.
Gingrichs comment is a surviving dog-whistle politics that include new state laws to drug-test those on public assistance and the ongoing effort to cut food stamps (and Gingrich did call Obama the food stamp president). The specter of the black ghetto still scripts urban dwellers as villains (often as thieves robbing the citizen either directly, or as in this Rick Santorum comment, indirectly: I dont want to make black peoples lives better by giving them other peoples money). But unlike the era of Ronald Reagans welfare queen, today cities are more ignored than attacked. And this goes well beyond Iowa.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)at a complex reality...
Cities and metropolitan areas are the engines of our economy, says Robert Puentes, senior fellow at the Brookings Institutions Metro Program. The top 100 metropolitan areas alone claim only 12 percent of our land mass but harbor more than 65 percent of our population, 74 percent of our most educated citizens, 77 percent of our knowledge economy jobs, and 84 percent of our most recent immigrants. They also generate 75 percent of the nations gross domestic product.
PETRUS
(3,678 posts)...about the impact of structure:
If the U.S. had a popular vote election, candidates would focus on saturating the major metropolitan media markets, a race to collect 51 percent of the votes by adding up the biggest population centers, says George Washington University historian Christopher Klemek, author of The Transatlantic Collapse of Urban Renewal. We wouldnt be talking about swing states; in fact, we wouldnt be talking about states at all. Cities or at least the broad, decentralized (sometimes tri-state) metropolitan urbanized regions that most Americans now inhabit would be at the center of the campaigns.