What If Obama Loses? Imagining the consequences of a GOP victory.
January/ February 2012
What If Obama Loses?
Imagining the consequences of a GOP victory.
By the Editors
Its a common complaintweve certainly made it over the yearsthat too much political campaign coverage focuses on the horse race. The packed debate schedule in the current GOP nomination battle has put a bit more focus than usual on the substance of what the candidates are saying, which is good. But even so, most of this coverage has wound up being about whether a given policy position might help or hurt a candidates chances of winning. Whats most important has been left largely unexamined: if one of these candidates actually becomes president and advances his or her policies, what would be the consequences for the nation?
Part of the reason this question is seldom addressed is that its genuinely hard to do; it requires thinking three steps ahead and accounting for numerous variables. But theres also a widespread assumption that extreme positions taken in the primaries will fade in the general election as candidates move to the center, and will disappear entirely once the serious business of governing begins. Surely President Newt Gingrich would not get rid of child labor laws. Surely President Perry would not seek to eliminate three cabinet departments.
We dont think that this year, with this GOP, those assumptions are warranted. And so we asked a distinguished group of reporters and scholars to think through the hitherto unthinkable: What if one of these people actually wins?
lots more...
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/january_february_2012/features/what_if_he_loses034501.php
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)Instead of quietly sitting back and eating peas.
greenman3610
(3,947 posts)right?
spartan61
(2,091 posts)It's just too horrific to think that another repuke would be the President again. We're still trying to dig out from the last GOP administration.
tilsammans
(2,549 posts)They want it back so bad, they'll stop at nothing to get it.
flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)To fill this gap, the Washington Monthly asked a group of distinguished journalists and scholars to think through the likely ramifications of a GOP victory in November. Heres what they conclude:
* David Weigel reports that the Tea Party will control the agenda regardless of which Republican wins the nomination.
* Norman Ornstein and Thomas Mann predict that theres a better-than-even chance that the Senate filibuster will be destroyed.
* David Roberts shows that the GOP wont eliminate the EPA, but will permanently cripple it.
* Harold Pollack disabuses liberals of the hope that health care reform can survive a Republican presidency.
* Dahlia Lithwick writes that one more round of judicial appointments by a Republican president will lead to a generation of anti-government rulings no future Democrat can undo.
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/index.php
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)hopefully the president will not use this as his main talking point