Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinto

(106,886 posts)
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 05:23 PM Feb 2013

Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us (Time Magazine)

By Steven Brill
Feb. 20, 2013

http://healthland.time.com/2013/02/20/bitter-pill-why-medical-bills-are-killing-us/

This is a great, detailed, comprehensive look at US health care costs. The author spent 7 months researching hospital billing practices, interviewing patients, health care professionals and hospital representatives to assemble a big picture review. Some of it may be familiar to many, some of it may be new info for many. A long read but I encourage you take a look. ~ pinto

?

http://healthland.time.com/2013/02/20/bitter-pill-why-medical-bills-are-killing-us/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us (Time Magazine) (Original Post) pinto Feb 2013 OP
it is outright fraud and theft Skittles Feb 2013 #1
Had gallbladder removed goclark Feb 2013 #7
it is just unbelieveable Skittles Feb 2013 #8
Do you mean YOU had to pay $41,000 after Medicare? pangaia Feb 2013 #13
Joe Scarborough John2 Feb 2013 #2
It would be better if politicians wore their sponsor's logos. GiveMeFreedom Feb 2013 #3
love the picture. copied it. Thanks. Thanks for bringing it to DU! Bill USA Feb 2013 #14
I have renal cell carcinoma stage IV and I have GiveMeFreedom Feb 2013 #4
don't let those lying, thieving bastards defeat you, GMF Skittles Feb 2013 #9
Thanks GiveMeFreedom Feb 2013 #10
I'm hoping this Time story prods some legal action Skittles Feb 2013 #11
A long read, but it must be read! NV Whino Feb 2013 #5
Yeah, Steven Brill did a good job with this piece. pinto Feb 2013 #6
Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP eridani Feb 2013 #12

goclark

(30,404 posts)
7. Had gallbladder removed
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 12:40 AM
Feb 2013

In and out the same day surgery.

$41,000 after BC/Medicare as of the moment.

Skittles

(153,113 posts)
8. it is just unbelieveable
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 01:39 AM
Feb 2013

I have long said they need to stop concentrating on how to pay for it and start focusing on why these bastards are allowed to commit outright FRAUD AND THEFT

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
2. Joe Scarborough
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:19 PM
Feb 2013

had this guy on his show and all the pundits present that day heard this story. Yet he continues to place focus on the receivers of Health benefits instead of the providers. That is what Congress needs to focus on, but they seem to be in their pockets just like the people on Wallstreet. I think Americans need to get better informed because this Congress will give them the shaft. Do the ordinary American citizen know that almost half of their Congress are millionaires? They are looking out for their own interests. This is all about profits or enriching themselves. It is not every person in Congress but you can tell the ones that are on the take. The same products and services Americans receive years ago cost more. The Health providers are doing the same thing the Oil Industry does because of the demand for their profession.

GiveMeFreedom

(976 posts)
4. I have renal cell carcinoma stage IV and I have
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 10:39 PM
Feb 2013

had better days. I have been retired for 2 years now and just started taking a drug called "Votrient" (pazopanib) a little over 4 months ago. The cost to me is a $30.00 copay every month, so far. Votrient comes in a 200mg tab, of which I take 4 a day or 800mg total. So, 30 days, times, 4 per day, equals 120 pills per month supply. I have heard of these pills costing as much as $12,000.00 for 120 (200mg) doses. I told my wife if our co-pay was going to be astronomical for Votrient, I would rather die than force her into any kind of poverty. I fear going to the hospital because of what they charge or the dentist for that matter.

About VOTRIENT
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Should a Chemo Drug That Doesn't Prolong Life Be Approved? Author: Billy Rubin's Blog
http://www.billyrubinsblog.org/2012/03/should-chemo-drug-that-doesnt-prolong.html
From the blog:

What made the article interesting and worthy of tweeting is that GSK was unable to demonstrate that Votrient actually prolonged the lives of the affected patients. GSK measured the drug's effectiveness in two ways: one by looking at survival, but two, by looking at something called "progression free survival"--or how long the tumors stay suppressed. The FDA summary notes: "median progression free survival was 4.6 months in the pazopanib arm and 1.6 months in the placebo arm...however, this improvement did not translate to an improvement in the overall survival...the median overall survival was 12.6 months in the pazopanib arm and 10.7 months in the placebo arm." [my emphasis]

Skittles

(153,113 posts)
11. I'm hoping this Time story prods some legal action
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 02:09 AM
Feb 2013

it is wrong, wrong what they are doing - it is fraud, deception, extortion - it is CRIMINAL what they are doing

eridani

(51,907 posts)
12. Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP
Wed Feb 27, 2013, 06:11 AM
Feb 2013

Steven Brill's TIME article, "Bitter Pill: Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us," seems to be awakening those who have, until now, accepted the very high prices of health care as an inevitability for having a technologically advanced health care system here in the United States.

In his 36 page article - which will surely be required reading in many health policy courses - Brill makes it clear that we no longer need to take the "bitter pill" of medical bills that are killing us. Clearly, Medicare already has several tools to control costs and has the potential for further improving value in the nation's health care purchasing.

At the end of his article, Brill seems to be advancing a non sequitur when he writes, "The real issue isn't whether we have a single payer or multiple payers. It's whether whoever pays has a fair chance in a fair market... We don't have to scrap our system and aren't likely to." This certainly does not follow from what he had to say as the central theme of his article.

He then recommends some tired or inadequate remedies that would have very little impact on the problems that we face in health care. What is ironic is that he has built a tremendous case for the logical solution - an improved Medicare for all - and then he seems to dismiss it. You cannot read his article and escape the conclusion that a single payer national health program is an absolute imperative, that is, if we really do want affordable care for everyone.

Download this article (the full 36 pages is available for free at the following link), and share it with others. But put a Post-it note on it that states: WARNING! For the health of our nation, ignore the section at the end titled "Changing Our Choices" (that's the tired remedies section), but concentrate on what an improved Medicare system could do for all of us. http://healthland.time.com/2013/02/20/bitter-pill-why-medical-bills-are-killing-us/


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Bitter Pill: Why Medical ...