Time for a Real Debate: Are Corporations People?
Published on Saturday, January 7, 2012 by [font color="blue"]CommonDreams.org[/font]
Time for a Real Debate: Are Corporations People?
by Robert Hinkley
Its true that corporations have no ability to act for themselves. They only act through people; their officers, directors, employees, lawyers and agents. However, the important question to ask is do corporations behave like people? Because if they dont behave like people, our nation faces a serious problem it wasnt designed to handle.
Our form of government was created in 1788 with the adoption of the US Constitution. This was a time when there were only a handful of corporations in existence (and none of the modern variety which have no obligations to protect the public interest). As a consequence, there is no mention anywhere in the Constitution of the word corporation.
This means that our government governs people and corporations the same waythrough the passage of laws enacted by our elected representatives. Until such laws are passed, both people and corporations can harm the environment and other elements of the public interest to the extent they have the capacity and inclination to do so. Sometimes the passage of effective new laws can take a very long time. Sometimes such laws never get passed.
The public interest is exposed while our leaders decide what should be done. However, people are unlikely to take advantage of this situation. They generally have little capacity or inclination to engage in behavior that harms the public interest. Modern corporations, on the other hand, have plenty of both. ...............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/01/07-2
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)A corporation allows the rich person owning or running it to do all manner of greedy, criminal, and sociopathic things, all with the excuse of "maximizing shareholder return".
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Thomas Jefferson said "Beware of the Monied interests".
City Lights
(25,171 posts)It is absurd to say otherwise, regardless of what the "Supreme" Court says.
To convince me otherwise, the person known as Exxon-Mobil or BP, for example, will have to go to jail. The corporation will have to be held to the same standard and suffer the same consequence as the least-powerful person. Until then, corporations are not people.
RC
(25,592 posts)"As a consequence, there is no mention anywhere in the Constitution of the word corporation.
This means that our government governs people and corporations the same way..."
No, that means that our government does NOT govern people and corporations the same way. For if it did, the Constitution WOULD have mentioned corporations, you mindless dork!.
rfranklin
(13,200 posts)Although corporations were not mentioned once in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights,
Thomas Jefferson famously noted that representative governments purpose was to curb the excesses
of the monied interests. Had the Founders realized how powerful corporations would become, likely
they would have created checks on their power
http://www.citizenworks.org/corp/dg/s2r1.pdf
CanonRay
(14,084 posts)Fuck no.
That is all.
saras
(6,670 posts)Corporations are no more people than horses are lug nuts, and to pretend otherwise, even for a moment, is stupidity worthy of a drunken six-year-old.
The debate as to what we might gain or lose by treating corporations as though they were the legal equivalent of people in certain specific contexts could potentially be productive, but people seem to prefer their fantasies and beliefs.