Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,280 posts)
Sat Jun 8, 2013, 09:31 PM Jun 2013

6-Month-Old E-Mails Easy Pickings for Police

The outdated 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act considers e-mail "abandoned" and searchable if it's stored for more than 180 days on a server. Larry Greenemeier reports

... The 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act was mostly aimed at protecting digital messages in transit. The Act existed before the widespread use of email and of massive computer memory that could easily store decades’ worth of messages. The law thus considers information that such as e-mail “abandoned” if it’s stored for more than 180 days on a service provider’s server. If law enforcement wants access to an abandoned e-mail, it only has to claim need for an investigation.

A little good news. The Justice Department supports requiring police to get a warrant to read your e-mail. Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy agrees, and is trying to get a law passed to make that official ...


http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=six-month-old-emails-easy-pickings-13-06-06

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
6-Month-Old E-Mails Easy Pickings for Police (Original Post) struggle4progress Jun 2013 OP
Statement of Acting Assistant Attorney General Elana Tyrangiel struggle4progress Jun 2013 #1
We need to change this, S4P! NYC_SKP Jun 2013 #2
DOJ supports changing it, as indicated upthread struggle4progress Jun 2013 #3

struggle4progress

(118,280 posts)
1. Statement of Acting Assistant Attorney General Elana Tyrangiel
Sat Jun 8, 2013, 09:38 PM
Jun 2013

Office of Legal Policy

<before the>

Committee on The Judiciary
Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations
United States House of Representatives

<regarding>

Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”)

<on>

March 19, 2013

... We are pleased to engage with the Subcommittee in discussions about how ECPA is used and how it might be updated and improved ... ECPA was originally enacted in 1986 — a time when the internet was still a nascent technology ... We agree, for example, that there is no principled basis to treat email less than 180 days old differently than email more than 180 days old ... Acknowledging that the so-called “180-day rule” and other distinctions in the SCA no longer make sense is an important first step ...

http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/113th/03192013_2/Tyrangiel%2003192013.pdf

struggle4progress

(118,280 posts)
3. DOJ supports changing it, as indicated upthread
Sat Jun 8, 2013, 09:41 PM
Jun 2013

But I'm surprised this old Reagan-era provision hasn't gotten more attention before now

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»6-Month-Old E-Mails Easy ...