Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,420 posts)
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 12:35 PM Jul 2013

Krugman: Defining Prosperity Down

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/08/opinion/krugman-defining-prosperity-down.html?_r=1&


By PAUL KRUGMAN

Published: July 7, 2013 651 Comments

Friday’s employment report wasn’t bad. But given how depressed our economy remains, we really should be adding more than 300,000 jobs a month, not fewer than 200,000. As the Economic Policy Institute points out, we would need more than five years of job growth at this rate to get back to the level of unemployment that prevailed before the Great Recession. Full recovery still looks a very long way off. And I’m beginning to worry that it may never happen.

Ask yourself the hard question: What, exactly, will bring us back to full employment?

We certainly can’t count on fiscal policy. The austerity gang may have experienced a stunning defeat in the intellectual debate, but stimulus is still a dirty word, and no deliberate job-creation program is likely soon, or ever.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Defining Prosperity Down (Original Post) Stuart G Jul 2013 OP
Well what else is to be expected with RepubliCONs in the majority? xtraxritical Jul 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles» Krugman: Defining Prosp...