Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
“Misled into believing” MLK was a great man: How some Republicans fought against the King holiday
These days, some conservatives embrace King. Let's revisit the fascinating battle within the GOP during the 1980sDAVID L. CHAPPELL
Excerpted from "Waking From the Dream"
As support for the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday grew, one new sponsor marked the tectonic shifts of symbolic alignments in the era. John Danforth was a new Republican senator from Missouri, a millionaire who had unseated the old liberal Democrat Stuart Symington in 1976. Danforth urged his fellow Republicans to join him in honoring King. Armed with a divinity degree, Danforth was helping to refashion the GOP as a crucible for the mixing of church and statejust as Jimmy Carter and Jesse Jackson were using public displays of religion to challenge the Democratic establishment. Danforth believed he was following Martin Luther Kings example.
Danforth later revealed that he had gotten to know King and Kings father when he served as a board member of Kings alma mater, Morehouse College. He did not want champions of the welfare state to have a monopoly on public claims of morality and decency. To Danforth, Kings determination in the fight for equality symbolized ―the spirit of American freedom and self-determination. Was Danforths view of Kings legacy in step with the growing body of social conservatives, who were campaigning vigorously to take over the GOP and the country? That question still appeared to be open, what with much of the pro-life movement claiming King as an inspiration and model, and with at least two Republican presidential candidates (John Connally and John Anderson) making a great show of repudiating their former opposition to King and civil rights. Danforth signaled a new possibility for conservative Republicans: They could claim some affinity, even allegiance, to Kings mantle. They may not have wanted to convince many black voters, and they did not need to. White conservatives in particular recognized in King a model to emulatenotably his use of religious enthusiasm and will-to-sacrifice. Nobody better illustrated Coretta Scott Kings point that King had spoken to us all.
* * *
Other conservatives got in Danforths way, however, with tough ideological attacks on Kings legacy. When Senator Strom Thurmond reconvened the joint hearing, opponents of the King holiday were given the most room they ever had in the record. First was Alan Stang, author of an anticommunist tract, Its Very Simple: The True Story of Civil Rights (1965). Stang enumerated Kings alleged communist associations more clearly than any holiday opponent had done on the record before. He also did a better job than anyone had in spelling out the claim that King provoked violence. To people who wondered why violence was so often a hallmark of Kings so-called nonviolent movement, Stang answered that violence was exactly what he wanted, citing Kings own article in the April 3, 1964, Saturday Review. There King laid out his strategy: Nonviolent demonstrators went into the streets to exercise their rights, and racists resisted by unleashing violence against them, which led Americans of conscience to demand federal intervention and legislation. So, Stang concluded, the violence he [King] got was not a surprise and King did not dislike it. He wanted it in order to pressure the Congress to enact still more totalitarian legislation.
Thurmond called a real live communist next: Julia Brown, a self-identified loyal American Negro, who worked as a communist organizer beginning in 1947. At first, Brown had thought she was joining a legitimate civil rights organization[.] Finding that I was a true member of the Communist Party[,] which advocated the overthrow of the United States Government, I decided to leave the organization, but I had to bide my time to avoid suspicion. Soon she went to the FBI to report what she had witnessed. In 1951, I was asked by the FBI to go back into the Communist Party as an undercover agent to report on their subversive activities. She claimed that only party members attended the meetings she attended. She frequently heard Martin Luther King discussed. The communist cells she was in were continually being asked to raise money for Martin Luther Kings activities and to support his civil rights movement by writing letters to the press and influencing local clergymen, and especially Negro clergymen that he was a good person, unselfishly working for the American Negro, and in no way connected with the Communist Party.
more
http://www.salon.com/2014/01/19/misled_into_believing_mlk_was_a_great_man_how_some_republicans_fought_against_the_king_holiday/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 1136 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post