Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 12:30 PM Jan 2012

Seventeen Minutes of Misdirection and Horseshit

http://www.balloon-juice.com/2012/01/22/seventeen-minutes-of-misdirection-and-horseshit/

Here’s Newt’s full victory speech, and as usual he has no peer in his ability to lay down lies, red herrings, culture warfare and good old-fashioned bullshit. He’s going to challenge Obama to seven three-hour debates, “and to be fair, I’ll let him use a teleprompter”. He thinks Ron Paul is spot-on about the Federal Reserve and fiat currency. He thinks the media are traitors:

“In the two debates we had here, in Myrtle Beach and in Charleston, where people reacted so strongly to the news media, I think it was something very fundamental that I wish the powers that be in the news media would take seriously. The American people feel that they have elites who have been trying for a half century to force us to quit being American and become some other kind of other system.”


As Jay Rosen notes, “The people in the news media are in effect a fifth column— traitors who are trying to ‘force’ upon Americans a society that is fundamentally (a key word in the Gingrich lexicon…) un-American”. Any politician with a personal life like Newt’s has to take on the media, but as with so many other issues, Newt goes one step further and calls them them traitors.

Listening to this, I’m struck by one thing: if Newt is the candidate, he’s going to drive the discussion into all the nooks and crannies of noise and diversion that have occupied Fox News viewers since Obama’s victory. In other words, Newt is the candidate of the 2009 media cycle, where the Tea Party dominated media coverage. If Romney is the candidate, a big part of the discussion will be how he managed to pay 15% tax on the millions he made. He’s the candidate of the 2011 media cycle, dominated by Occupy Wall Street and issues of jobs and equity.

Even though it would appear that Newt’s candidacy is better for the establishment, establishment Republicans are going to try to snuff out his campaign. Two points about that: First, how the hell is this amorphous “establishment” going to do it? Are they going to put Walnuts on the campaign trail gritting his teeth and explaining how he loves Mitt Romney? Are Reince Preibus and Jon Huntsman going to use the combined force of their charisma to convince the 27 percenters to annoint an East Cost RINO Mormon? Second, what’s so bad for the establishment about having a shit-slinger like Newt take attention away from the unfairness of eternal tax cuts? He guarantees that the issues of the election will all be sideshow trivia: Obama will be explaining why he isn’t like Saul Alinsky, the media will be explaining why they aren’t traitors, and Paul Krugman will be explaining what “fiat currency” means.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Seventeen Minutes of Misd...