Deal Book Embraces Unintentional Self-Parody ( William K. Black )
May 2, 2014
I have been attempting the vain act of trying to embarrass the New York Times Deal Book feature into dropping its ethics-free reportage of elite financial crimes. I have had so little success that todays James Stewart column reached the pinnacle of unintentional self-parody of Deal Books zealous efforts to remove any concept of ethics from its reportage of elite white-collar crime. The substance of piece is reporting that Steve Jobs was a walking antitrust violation. Stewart focuses on the cartel Jobs formed with other giant firms to fix (and suppress) employees salaries.
But the title of the piece takes the fact that Jobs was a serial felon who caused great harm to employees and preforms a remarkable transformation in which he is praised as Steve Jobs, a Genius at Pushing Boundaries. Pushing boundaries is Deal Books euphemism for Jobs crimes that he committed in order to make the already spectacularly wealthy CEO even wealthier at the direct expense of his employees. And, this being Deal Book, and James Stewart being what Stewart has descended to, we have the inevitable claim that Jobs was a genius at crime. But it turns out that if you consider the facts reported; he wasnt a genius. His violations of anti-trust law were obvious crimes. Instead, his key characteristic was the one we always emphasize is critical about the most fraudulent CEOs audacity. Jobs had gotten away with committing so many crimes that he came to believe he was immune from prosecution.
At this stage in the story, Stewart obviously had to explore at least four ethical issues to explain to readers the significance of Jobs crimes. The first issue was the unique danger created by the fact that greed is insatiable. It did not matter how much a plutocrat Jobs became he always wanted more and was happy to engage in brazen crimes to make him wealthier. The second issue is that he was willing to commit crimes that made him wealthier at the direct expense of his employees. Third, CEOs set the ethical tone at the top and when the CEO is a crook he sets a corrupt tone at the top that encourages the employees to commit other crimes and unethical acts that would boost their pay. Fourth, the CEOs of Apples top rivals agreed to commit the same cartel felonies as Jobs. This created a Greshams dynamic that helps other ethical firms (or potential entrants) out of the markets.
As you knew, because it was Deal Book and because of the title of Stewarts column, the column exemplifies the Deal Books deliberate policy of excluding discussions of the ethical and business implications of elite fraud committed with impunity. This is particularly awkward, if logical consistency were a trait Deal Book embraced, given the first sentence of Stewarts column. If Steve Jobs were alive today, should he be in jail? Answering the question should inherently requires a discussion of ethics. Stewart, however, is simply being coy his article never discusses or answers the question he describes as the provocative question being debated in antitrust circles
. Nor does Stewart ask why that question is being debated in antitrust circles rather than in the high tech industry.
http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2014/05/deal-book-embraces-unintentional-self-parody.html#more-8180