The End of ‘Genius’ By JOSHUA WOLF SHENK, NY Times...
"WHERE does creativity come from? For centuries, weve had a clear answer: the lone genius. The idea of the solitary creator is such a common feature of our cultural landscape (as with Newton and the falling apple) that we easily forget its an idea in the first place.
But the lone genius is a myth that has outlived its usefulness. Fortunately, a more truthful model is emerging: the creative network, as with the crowd-sourced Wikipedia or the writers room at The Daily Show or the real heart of creativity the intimate exchange of the creative pair, such as John Lennon and Paul McCartney and myriad other examples with which weve yet to fully reckon.
Historically speaking, locating genius within individuals is a recent enterprise. Before the 16th century, one did not speak of people being geniuses but having geniuses. Genius, explains the Harvard scholar Marjorie Garber, meant a tutelary god or spirit given to every person at birth. Any value that emerged from within a person depended on a potent, unseen force coming from beyond that person.
As late as the Renaissance, people wed now consider quasi-divine creators were more likely to be seen as deft imitators, making compelling work from familiar materials. Shakespeare, for example, did not typically dream up new ideas for plays but rewrote, adapted and borrowed from the plots, characters and language of previous works. Romeo and Juliet, as Mark Rose, a professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, notes, is an episode-by-episode dramatization of a poem by Arthur Brooke."
....
<Snip>
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-genius.html?_r=0
Excellent article and confirms what I've believed for decades.
Enjoy you bunch of geniuses