Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Netroots 2014: A Conversation with Progressive Leaders
John Hudak | July 22, 2014 3:45pm
This weekend, as part of an ongoing project on political parties and grassroots activism, I attended Netroots Nation, a progressive political action conference. I had the opportunity to sit down with one organization in attendance, Democracy for America (DFA). DFA is a progressive grassroots organization that describes itself as a member driven, people-powered PAC. I spoke with the organizations chairman, Jim Dean (brother of 2004 presidential candidate and VT Governor, Howard Dean), and Charles Chamberlain, the organizations executive director.
What are the benefits of Netroots Nation for an organization like yours or for progressives in general?
Jim Dean: For uslike everybody elseits a chance for everybody to get together and to communicate with each other, like we do throughout the year, but not face to face. For DFA, were involved in a lot of coalition work, and so that networking is really important not only for our partners but for finding other people. We also have a scholarship program that we have been running, since about two or three years after it started. Several years ago we started sending anywhere from 30-40 people here. Thats really good for us to be part of because we actually get a lot smarter about what people are doing in their communities. Ive often said our best ideas come from outside of the officethats not entirely true because we have some really smart people here (in our office)what those folks are doing is really what matters. Netroots is really a paradigm of that. It really gets us into that in a big way.
Charles Chamberlain: Some of this event is about looking at what weve done and looking at best practiceswhat worked and what didnt. Some of this event is about direct skills training. Some if this event is about planning for the future, and its about looking at what are the big issues coming up and where were going to be. Its about discussions that lead to big picture and lead to small picture or sometimes both.
What are the biggest issues youre going to be chasing in tougher races to get traction among voters?
CC: We know that income inequality is the biggest issue of our time. Economics matters. We need to rebuild our middle class. The difference between what a CEO makes and what a low-wage worker makes in this country is offensive. Its not sustainable. The answer to the question of what are the issues that work, arent actually different in a blue state like Oregon or a red state like Texas or Kentucky. The reality is, we polled expanding Social Security in Kentucky, and of course the majority of Democrats supported it. But so did the independents, and so did the majority of Republicans in Kentucky. The majority of Republicans in Texas supported expanding Social Security. This is a winning path, and in fact, if Mary Landrieu or Mark Pryor loses, one of the reasons they lose is because they havent embraced expanding Social Security. If they would run on that issue, they would be attaching themselves to a very popular issue that would have a real impact on income inequality and make a real difference.
Read more at: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/fixgov/posts/2014/07/22-netroots-2014-progressive-leaders-hudak?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 651 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post