from what I've seen and heard about him (my primary source has been the DU & CNN); strike me as someone trying to do the best he can. Between lawmakers arguing the legality of the laws they themselves made. Governmental agencies deciding the word "primarily" is camouflaged in the word "exclusively" many years ago and it has become the precedent. Mr Holder's apparent commitment to the idea of human dignity by refusing to even consider micromanagement of the people he leads. My Holder's trust of the people appointed to agencies he is not in charge of. His ability to maintain a calm adult demeanor when faced with for all intents and purposes is a spoiled, petulant three year old who thinks himself a king. A chorus of public voices, more in love with their own sound bites than justice or truth, calling out disparagement. I think Mr. Holder has done a wonderful job.
Mr. Issa on the other hand has impressed me in a different way. He seems to have an great distrust of other people as individuals and if they are in a group he is not a member of, his focus on micromanagement indicates him placing a high value on micromanaging; as we view the world through the filter of ourselves, his distrust of others would seem to indicate he, himself, is untrustworthy. His abuse of executive branch like powers while a member of of the Legislative branch clearly shows confusion on American government; He can inquire as to someone's understanding of a law and point out possible violations of laws. He does not serve as an enforcer of laws (executive branch) or get to render guilt of violation of laws (Judaical branch). He seems to think both fall within his grasp. Combine these points with Mr. Issa belonging to a faction in government outraged the executive exercises power they gave his predecessor. Mr. Issa looks more and more untrustworthy, delusional, and full of "what were you thinking?" than Mr. Holder.
DING DING DING the winner by the opponent being technically an idiot, ERIC HOLDER!!!!!!
= new reply since forum marked as read
