Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 06:37 AM Jan 2014

Maddow Exposes Christie's Likely Fingerprints On Bridge Shutdown - Why That Day?!! Shocker!!



The one question that many of us who have seen the shutdown bridge story as a strange unfolding of events have been asking ourselves - why attack the mayor when so many other Democrats weren't attacked. Why that particular one? Why that particular target? Why, more importantly, on THAT PARTICULAR DAY?

Rachel Maddow opens a can of evidence to suggest that not only was it likely Christie had his hand in the bridge attack on the town of Fort Lee, but it was for an entirely different reason that is currently being talked about. That is has absolutely NOTHING to do with the mayor, but more to do with the Democratic leader of the Senate who's district is, in fact, Fort Lee.

For the story in print, click here -- the video above should give you an idea of what Rachel thinks may be the real reason to give the case a second look as to how high the decision to shut the bridge down goes.

And it sounds like Christie's fingerprints are all over it.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maddow Exposes Christie's Likely Fingerprints On Bridge Shutdown - Why That Day?!! Shocker!! (Original Post) tomm2thumbs Jan 2014 OP
Posted it via Crooks and Liars JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #1
I hope he doesn't keep his sets and goes LukeFL Jan 2014 #16
ah hah! florida08 Jan 2014 #2
that's it, no doubt. go Rachel! tomp Jan 2014 #3
A real journalist Sienna86 Jan 2014 #4
That is what journalism is about GarH Jan 2014 #5
k & r for the best journalist in America. mahina Jan 2014 #6
k & r thanks for posting..... nt Stuart G Jan 2014 #7
I love Rachel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! davidpdx Jan 2014 #8
It was brilliant. think4yourself Jan 2014 #9
"the entire show is a must see if you haven't already." Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #15
But the Senate Leader claimed that she didn't quite buy the theory BumRushDaShow Jan 2014 #10
Rachel has just discovered the smoking gun. Snarkoleptic Jan 2014 #11
No doubt in my mind he had 100% knowledge - but I think it was all done with a wink and a nod tomm2thumbs Jan 2014 #12
Great, compelling reporting Faygo Kid Jan 2014 #13
So much for the "working together" Beltway myth about this Thug. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #14

JustAnotherGen

(31,815 posts)
1. Posted it via Crooks and Liars
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 06:42 AM
Jan 2014

In the NJ Forum. I think she nailed it. It was a topic of discussion at my local Democratic meet up on Tuesday . . . Not as it relates to this - but in general for the State.

I think it's right under our nose - and it makes sense. This battle has been going on for close to four years now.
the resolve of our Democrats in Trenton is nothing short of Amazing.

I take back what I said about Weinberg and Wiesnewski just rolling over on this yesterday. They aren't. They just need the resolve they've shown on high court appointees. Christie may very well get to keep his seat - but it's going to be hard as a rock going forward.

florida08

(4,106 posts)
2. ah hah!
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 07:09 AM
Jan 2014

She could be a detective. There's more to come. Why would he pull a republican judge's lifetime tenure not to mention terminate a close friend's wife's job. The flimsy reason doesn't walk.

think4yourself

(837 posts)
9. It was brilliant.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 08:48 AM
Jan 2014

She laid out the timeline and showed him having a tantrum late afternoon on August 12, then, at the crack of dawn on the 13th, the quite elaborate conspiracy was set into motion.
Refreshing to have a true journalist and the entire show is a must see if you haven't already.

BumRushDaShow

(128,892 posts)
10. But the Senate Leader claimed that she didn't quite buy the theory
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 09:23 AM
Jan 2014

She was sortof point blank about it too.... We shall see...

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
12. No doubt in my mind he had 100% knowledge - but I think it was all done with a wink and a nod
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 09:34 AM
Jan 2014

Staff can technically say 'can you imagine what would happen if the George Washington Bridge was shut down for a few days?' and have a response from Christie like 'whooaa boy, that would be a good start'... and technically it is all conjecture, no one is giving him the plan, yet he is letting his staff know EXACTLY what he would enjoy see happening. Let's face it, that sort of thing happens ALL THE TIME and it would be foolish do think for one second that he was not consulted, whether by conjecture, or with a 'scenario' or with some kind of offer of information that would give the staff a silent 'go ahead' from the man they worked for.

It defies reason to think he had absolutely no involvement in it, even if by a knowing smile, a tacit approval and a thumbs up to those who put themselves in the planning stages of pulling this off.

Faygo Kid

(21,478 posts)
13. Great, compelling reporting
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 09:52 AM
Jan 2014

I think she nailed it - it wasn't the mayor's lack of an endorsement, it was the Senate majority leader Christie was after. The timing just fits.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Maddow Exposes Christie's...