Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumWould White German Pilot Crashing Plane Be 'Terrorism' if He Were Muslim?
From: The David Pakman Show
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)He was doing it as a terrorist act. Otherwise probably same reaction.
msongs
(67,395 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)if the pilot had been a Muslim named Muhammed rather than a Lutheran named Andreas. In fact, I bet the assholes at Faux News are a little disappointed that he was just a German guy with mental health problems instead of a Muslim bent on religiously-motivated chaos and destruction.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)You know if he had a dark tan or a beard they would still be trying shove that square peg into the round hole.
onecaliberal
(32,829 posts)Or potential terrorists.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)It reminds me of the coverage of Hurricane Katrina.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)gordianot
(15,237 posts)louis-t
(23,292 posts)Journeyman
(15,031 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,681 posts)was a Muslim (as are most Egyptians), but there was never any evidence suggesting his actions were motivated in any way by his religion, and he was not known to have strong religious convictions. However, he had been passed up for promotion to Captain and was in trouble with his employer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gameel_Al-Batouti
But just because he was a Muslim, it was initially assumed by many that this was an act of religiously-motivated terrorism.
Journeyman
(15,031 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)Why isn't the Jebus media all ablaze blaming heterosexuals for this?
marble falls
(57,079 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)Because he had no manifesto, no political reason for what he did. He didn't seem to be making a point at all.
It was narcissistic, not a political act.
At least based on the info we have so far. Now, if he did it as an act against Lufthansa ---maybe a case could be made. But you're point is well taken--they still won't call him a "terrorist".