Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumPic Of The Moment: What Must His Friends Think? "Family Values" Champion Admits To Child Molestation
A lot of Republicans who want to be president got their picture taken with a child molester
Josh Duggar Admits Molestation, Resigns from Family Research Council
Follow @demunderground
malthaussen
(17,175 posts)Now, about criminal prosecution...
-- Mal
central scrutinizer
(11,637 posts)But the old testament god didn't believe in no stinking statute of limitations -
Johonny
(20,818 posts)I hope every victim sues is bigoted hate filled hypocritical ass.
sorefeet
(1,241 posts)molestation as the limit. I know my landlord got 10 years for molesting 2 nieces a step daughter and his own daughter plus 20 probation when he gets out. Only one counted, his daughter, because the statute ran out on the other three.
catbyte
(34,337 posts)"men folk" are the masters and are to be protected at any cost. The chattel, er...girls...not so much. It's despicable. Even worse, he's got daughters of his own now, and pedophiles don't change.
SunSeeker
(51,513 posts)Pedophiles never change. They may get old and less active, but they don't change.
PNW_Dem
(119 posts)The Duggars home school their kids. This is the funniest home schooling video I have ever seen. Whenever I hear the home schooling topic, I can't help not thinking about this video.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Must not believe Josh would "fare well" in Hell.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Meanwhile, in reality world, we need to take violence against women seriously. Consequences for perpetrators, NO more apologies for male misbehavior, believe and support victims.
irisblue
(32,931 posts)erronis
(15,183 posts)In some ways the old ways might be better. If you stole, you lost your hand. Ears, eyes, etc.
I think most of the people that take advantage of children or engage in other involuntary acts should have the offending members separated. I spay/neuter my animals after all.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I would love to give men who hurt women, or people who hurt animals or kids the revenge they so deserve, honestly....sometimes I really wish I could.
But that leads to too many more negative consequences, including bad effects on your own life. Bad karma.
Response to BlancheSplanchnik (Reply #44)
Name removed Message auto-removed
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)see him sobbing and begging forgiveness and apologizing...for getting caught? And hey, at least he quit. Seems he still has a couple of morals left, maybe even some shame.
And to think, this irrefutable proof came about accidentally, or not, after many years.
catbyte
(34,337 posts)We don't really know for sure. I'm wondering how his daughters are. They're the ones in danger now.
tclambert
(11,084 posts)silverweb
(16,402 posts)[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]That's pretty much what I was going to say, except I was going to blame the attitude more on the fundy mindset:
God created women for men, i.e. to dominate, and to use as baby machines and servants. Therefore, the actual "family values" rules only apply to women and children, but men can do pretty much what they want (as long as they don't get caught).
This slime-bucket is only sorry because he's been exposed.
randys1
(16,286 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)that can be moved...and used to include slaves, and earlier women and children...quite literally. It is from this concept that all females and young boys to the age of 12 were owned ... how the woman taking the man's surname began...and chastity belts were arranged.
It's not hard to see how many of these issues continue, in some form or other, to this day. For some women, the Title Ms. and the concept of the hyphenated last name and birth control is a further move away from this deplorable history.
chattel
[chat-l]
noun
1.
Law. a movable article of personal property.
2.
any article of tangible property other than land, buildings, and other things annexed to land.
3.
a slave.
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)Nothing says small gub'mint libertarian like getting together with a child molester from a fundie group who wants the government to persecute gays.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)is it not? SMFH
paleotn
(17,884 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Is it just because he's on TV?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Black asked a similar question and then answered himself:
"See, his ____ works!" Thus, worthy of attention.
Don't see much different in the adulation of that family and the faux Duck Family gang.
Regarding the television thing. Yeah, they put this stuff out for the terminally bored who eat it like candy. It's cool because it was on teevee!
I imagine a reality show in the future exalting the actions of ISIS and the vapid public will drool:
"Oh, what strong men!" I really do see that in our future, after countenancing all this other BS.
Like that slime bucket. Lights, music, action! It's all good!
Monkey see, monkey do. Play that laugh track and the canned applause and that means we all agree with it. Well, those who haven't turned the damned Evil Eye off, that is.
benld74
(9,901 posts)even she said, they seem like nice people,,,.
I saw one episode where Josh was moving the family to D.C. and they were looking at homes. My internal siren went off - WHAT JOB could he have gotten that allows him to purchase a million dollar home??? Based upon his education and experience????
That's the other side of the story as they say
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)czarjak
(11,254 posts)Huh, Josh?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Sick purvs, all of them!
certainot
(9,090 posts)democrats......
we'll do a few stories about it and the MSM will ignore it for the most part but it will fade away soon.
not so in the other case.
durablend
(7,455 posts)Somehow they'll find an excuse how Obama or "teh evul demoncrats" are behind all of this.
ailsagirl
(22,885 posts)same as they always do.
Remember, to them the truth is irrelevant
Yavin4
(35,421 posts)Because God said that it was okay.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)3catwoman3
(23,949 posts)...it doesn't matter one damn bit if god forgives you. It matters if the people you harmed forgive you. So there, Jeb!
This god forgives me stuff seems like a way too easy way out. Especially for repeat offenders
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Why would God want to talk to this obscene person?
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)the "get-out-of-anything-free" card. Swindle somebody - God forgives you. Kill somebody? - God forgives you - Molest some innocent sorts - God forgives you. Hell - there's even Gods that REWARD you for doing some of the aforementioned things.
Makes you wonder just WHY we bother with laws and punishments if the ULTIMATE power just wipes your rap sheet clean when you ask him to!
I may just have to start attending some house of worship. Just as soon as I review them all to see who gives the best return for my worship! I mean - 72 virgins might sound like fun if I were younger. But at my age it just sounds like a really arduous task!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)calimary
(81,125 posts)This really makes me uncomfortable. I believe in a loving and forgiving God. But what I DO NOT believe is that this just gives you a blanket free pass. Murder someone? "Oh, I'M FORGIVEN!" Cheat somebody and steal from them? "Oh, I'M FORGIVEN!!" Screw somebody over? "Oh, I'M FORGIVEN!!!" Do whatever-the-fuck you want to hurt or violate or otherwise fuck over your fellow man but it's all okay because you're already forgiven. THAT is what it's turned into.
NO, george w. dry-drunk. YOU ARE NOT forgiven. No josh Bugger (OOPS I mean Duggar), YOU are NOT forgiven. NO YOU DO NOT get some Heavenly free pass.
If we're all forgiven, then why is there presumably a Hell? Where is the punishment and accountability for crimes committed against one's fellow man? Oh, I guess that's really just not needed. Because yer already fergivven!
Efilroft Sul
(3,578 posts)Admit it, whoever alerted on me months back, I had his number and his family's number.
father founding
(619 posts)God forgives him ? Only time will tell. I thought incest was a crime, wheres the jail time ?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)reaping those seeds you sow!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Minor sexually assaulting minor girls. It could have been a couple of 15 year olds petting.
samsingh
(17,593 posts)did they know about this molestation history? if not why not? if they did, why didn't they stop seeing him?
do they approve of molesting children?
calimary
(81,125 posts)From what I've read, seems like a lot of this was pushed under the rug so the Breeders could go on teeeeveeee and become rich and famous and role models for reckless overbreeding. I have to wonder about the family patriarch - what drove him to keep knocking up that unfortunate woman he married? What kind of ridiculous overcompensation do we have here? And WHY do we have a family like this glorified and held up as some sort of role models? Obviously this guy never heard of ZPG!
Whenever I see magazines with the Breeders (sorry, but that's what I've thought they were from the beginning - I've never been enthralled by this kind of family) or the "Teen Moms" on the cover, I just want to run in the opposite direction! Confession: I LOVE some of those trashy magazines. They're silly and fun, celebrity froo-froo. But I refuse to look at, much less buy, any of 'em if they have those subjects on the cover. Seems to me that's just signaling that "hey, you should do this, too! You might get a TV SHOW and become rich and famous!!!!" We saw that with the so-called "Octomom." She birthed all those babies assuming she'd get a TV show and become a star, or at least have that to help her support all those kids. Honestly, WHAT THE HELL WAS SHE THINKING??????? Same thing with that ridiculous "Jon and Kate plus 8" crap. I think that's what started it all. I couldn't be less interested. Seems to me all that does is hold up that kind of reckless overbreeding as a positive example of some sort, and encourages it in others so THEY TOO can get themselves a nice lucrative TV deal.
samsingh
(17,593 posts)calimary
(81,125 posts)guy. Wonder how many of his sisters he molested? Awfully nice of his parents to provide all those easy marks for him, and all under their own comfortable little family roof.
samsingh
(17,593 posts)Initech
(100,040 posts)calimary
(81,125 posts)to ALL the GOPers.
AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN. Connect the dots for the public. We HAVE to do that. We can't count on the media to do their jobs, so WE have to do their jobs for them, I'm afraid.
Wish I could recommend this post, and recommend it multiple times, Initech!
Initech
(100,040 posts)Not to mention other horrifying crimes. Josh Duggar is due for a trip through the criminal justice system, and it needs to be well established that he's the face of family values kooks.
Last edited Wed May 27, 2015, 02:34 PM - Edit history (1)
Huckabooby is already defending him. Birds of a feather?
catbyte
(34,337 posts)but got off scot free because dad was Governor at the time. Animal abuse and pedophilia are equally despicable, aberrant behaviors, but it's all good--after all, they were under 18 & God has forgiven them.
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)That is a pre-emptive quote, because I'm sure someone on the right will eventually say it.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)Else who has done this in jail?
They certainly should be but it would seem if he can claim redemption they could also.
These 'family values' cons want the death penalty for even children but this pervert can just continue on as usual? No mercy for anyone else.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Response to EarlG (Original post)
allan01 This message was self-deleted by its author.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)or commentator on their former colleague?
4lbs
(6,831 posts)God:
"Hey, Josh, you know Lot right? I turned his wife into a pillar of salt for simply looking back at Sodom and Gomorrah. Guess what kind of 'redemption' is waiting for someone who actually participated in a 21st Century version of it?"
rizlaplus
(159 posts)to preach about eternal damnation.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)erpowers
(9,350 posts)Some of his supporters will claim that Liberals are only angry because he supports family values. I remember when Rush Limbaugh first got caught getting his maid to buy drugs for him. A supporter of Limbaugh wrote to People Magazine and claimed Liberal were only angry at Rush Limbaugh because he supported family values. At the time I was shocked that someone would write that type of response. I guess some of my shock came from feeling Limbaugh's supporter was not making him take responsibility for his actions.