Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 09:57 AM Dec 2015

9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by GP6971 (a host of the Video & Multimedia forum).



This is my response to the very popular one minute video of the so called debunking of the argument against molten steel posted on DU. Anyway here is the argument about molten steel and 911, not that steel is not malleable when heated. Nobody is making that argument.

Hoping he or any of his supporters sees this and tries debunking the main argument the opposition is making. This is more of a response to the video posted on DU than a CT video. So please don't alert.

Watch and Enjoy

Edit: its a response to this thread http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017314993.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate (Original Post) jamzrockz Dec 2015 OP
No need to watch, that thermite theory is just the result of another truther pathology. nt TheBlackAdder Dec 2015 #1
I think he makes a decent case for (at least) more investigation. BlueJazz Dec 2015 #2
Thanks for at least giving it a chance jamzrockz Dec 2015 #3
This is just stupid CT... Delver Rootnose Dec 2015 #4
I know jamzrockz Dec 2015 #7
If it is a response to a video posted on DU... thesquanderer Dec 2015 #5
I notice that there is little in the way of scientific curiosity in several responses. Ford_Prefect Dec 2015 #6
Exactly. gregcrawford Dec 2015 #8
Locking GP6971 Dec 2015 #9

TheBlackAdder

(28,076 posts)
1. No need to watch, that thermite theory is just the result of another truther pathology. nt
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 10:07 AM
Dec 2015
 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
2. I think he makes a decent case for (at least) more investigation.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 10:14 AM
Dec 2015
 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
3. Thanks for at least giving it a chance
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 10:26 AM
Dec 2015

Watch his other videos where he uses simple to understand experiments to explain why the official story cannot be truth. Its a series that is worth your time.

Delver Rootnose

(250 posts)
4. This is just stupid CT...
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 10:38 AM
Dec 2015

So these untrained pilots, or any pilot for that matter could ram a plane into the exact floors where the supposed demo charges were rigged. Or did they rig the whole building, something that takes days on actual demolitions, just on the off chance the planes missed. And if they rigged the building to explode why ram planes into them. They could have just blow. The building s up and framed some person or persons as the bombers and get the exact same rage.

FFS the amount of disbelief you need to suspend to believe this stuff is like a religion.

So what is it. The government is so incompetent that it can't do anything correct and is the cause of all our problems or some ultra effective skilled machine that is able to keep a conspiracy of a magnitude the size of a sun secret even though so many have investigated.

You are given a brain use it.

As a side note does DU tolerate this crap. The culture here sometimes baffles me.

 

jamzrockz

(1,333 posts)
7. I know
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 12:45 PM
Dec 2015

How were those untrained amateur pilots flying for the first time on the jumbo jets able to perform such a maneuver that hit those 2 buildings? lets not even talk about the guy who hit the pentagon cos his performance was even more complex than hitting the twin towers. But this thread is focused on the molten steel debate not some conspiracy theory about what untrained amateur pilots are able to do, that's a discussion for another thread

It was OK to post the blacksmith's simplistic mocking of people who support further investigation of 911 on DU, so I hope the admins lets this stand.

thesquanderer

(11,955 posts)
5. If it is a response to a video posted on DU...
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 10:56 AM
Dec 2015

...why not post it as a Reply to that video?

Ford_Prefect

(7,828 posts)
6. I notice that there is little in the way of scientific curiosity in several responses.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 12:26 PM
Dec 2015

Sad to see such blunted vision as if only one answer is acceptable. A shame we see that kind of narrowed vision here at DU. It's almost like blind faith in a religion.

In the day of extensive government outsourcing of all kinds of specialized services why would you assume only an allegedly inadequate government agency could be the only possible source of such a plan or the only means for such a plan to be put in place?

With an administration at the time widely known for its willingness to hide all kinds of nefarious activities, and one with a history of direct relationships to the activist, regime-change side of the intelligence community, why would it NOT be reasonable to ask for better proofs and public inquiry?

gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
8. Exactly.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:20 PM
Dec 2015

And let us not forget that the same kind of malevolent fanaticism that defined the Cheney/Bush regime has held sway in the CIA since its inception. It was Allen Dulles' crew that floated the idea of killing thousands of innocent Americans, then blaming the attack on Castro so they could justify invading Cuba. Eisenhower shot down that scheme, but the point is, someone conceived the idea and was willing to put it into action.

Anyone who doesn't believe the authors and adherents of the Project for a New American Century would be willing to implement just such a murderous "False Flag" attack in order to further their diseased political agenda are living in a fantasy world.

Those at the top of the Conservative food chain are irredeemably evil psychopaths with not a molecule of conscience. How can anyone listen to Dick Cheney's venom for even a minute or two and not know that?

Oh, and Douglas Adams RULES!

GP6971

(31,017 posts)
9. Locking
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:44 PM
Dec 2015

Please repost in CS

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»9/11 Experiments: The Gre...