Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumTYT Coverage of the Democratic Debate on NBC News & YouTube
The Young Turks SummaryBiggest Winner
Biggest Loser
Best Line
Worst Line
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)We were doing a drinking game here.
Every time the moderators said "Iran" we took a shot.
longship
(40,416 posts)No Cenk? Too bad.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)they called Clinton the winner so if you support bernie don't watch them.I don't know what they were on.
thomservo
(147 posts)not jimmy and anna.
ejbr
(5,852 posts)he was projecting what others would consider a win based on previous debates. His reasons were because Hillary appears to wear teflon like Trump, and therefore things we may find obvious, others will not. So, to not defend him, one could argue that he thought Hillary won the debate before it even began.
swilton
(5,069 posts)Must haves for circulation to my f/b group!
raindaddy
(1,370 posts)They spent half the time lamenting the fact that Martin O'Malley who's only polling at 7% in his home state didn't get more airtime..
While I like O'Malley at this stage of the game he's beginning to become irrelevant, he's beginning to seem more like the kid at the dinner table trying to interrupt his parents discussion at the dinner table because he wants the attention..
I'd much rather watch Hillary and Sanders go head to head, especially now that were so close to the primaries and there's only a couple of debates left..
ejbr
(5,852 posts)one that would have been better during a previous debate. I know John is a Bernie supporter, not sure about the middle guy, but the third guy seems really hard on O'Malley. I do find it interesting that so many people/pundits found Bernie to be the one who edged out Hillary and these three did not. It almost seemed that John was intimidated by the assessment of the other two. I have yet to watch the debate to make my own judgment/
I;m guessing Cenk will not pass on giving commentary. His will be solo, lengthy and well-thought out. Give it time.