Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumGrand Jury Confirmed? Judge Explains How Immunity Indicates Jury Already Seated
Yes, this is from FoxNews and I groan along with that, but what is being explained I could not find elsewhere so posting with caveat. From what is said about Bryan Pagliano's immunity:
- Immunity can only be granted by a Federal Judge
- A Federal Judge would only grant immunity for prosecutors in a sitting Grand Jury
- Immunity would only be granted if information the witness has would assist prosecution
- Prosecutors grant temporary 1-day immunity to hear what witness-evidence exists prior to full-immunity
- Evidence given by witness would have to be sufficient to indict someone in a Grand Jury
Could be this is going after someone in the staff, but often they will indict in order to force another witness to testify higher up in the chain, so this may be one part of a larger process.
Obviously much of what Napolitano says is complete right wing talking points, but you can filter that out as the process of granting Federal immunity, and what it indicates, is what is noteworthy and I have not seen other information being provided regarding this case. Again, please filter out as needed, especially when he starts talking 'espionage' as I don't think this rises to that of course.... FoxNews-types just can't help themselves.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)BTW, what type of immunity did the person receive? "Formal immunity" or "Informal immunity"?
riversedge
(70,092 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)But you apparently don't recognize it. Does that make one shameless?
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Darb
(2,807 posts)1996? Tell me, why do you post the same things that a teabagger would? I wouldn't know where to find that old shit, but you can pull it right out of your ass. Curious that.
Gross.
a thousand times over
Why?
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Yes, they LOVE the New York Times
Keep trying --
Darb
(2,807 posts)Articles like that are archived on every Teabagger computer in every teabagger basement. I get that, Baggers are insane, paranoid kooks. But DU members retrieving that shit and coughing it up? That's funny to me.
You obviously cannot make the connection. Is that saved in the Whitewater file or the Vince Foster file?
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)apparently Google is part of your conspiracy - search clinton grand jury new york times
keep trying, or is it nap time for you
Darb
(2,807 posts)Can you explain why you agree with the Baggers please, and quit obfusgating? Just curious? what other things do you have in common with them? You are parroting their loony Clinton hate, what else? This is important for context don't you think?
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Perhaps you should find other reading appropriate to your level
(actually, your later posts 14-18 seem to answer all the questions anyone might have about your level)
Thanks for confirming
Darb
(2,807 posts)Thanks.
Darb
(2,807 posts)You know where to look.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Dig out that file too.
Darb
(2,807 posts)Thanks.
Darb
(2,807 posts)My Granny had that one on the back of her bathroom door but she has passed. Can you find it for me?
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)You don't need a judge to grant immunity. Pagliano probably got letter immunity, not statutory immunity. That means DOJ sent him a letter saying he won't be prosecuted no matter what he says. So none of this proves there is or isn't a grand jury.
Btw, Napolitano was never a federal judge or prosecutor.