Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 04:19 AM Mar 2016

Grand Jury Confirmed? Judge Explains How Immunity Indicates Jury Already Seated




Yes, this is from FoxNews and I groan along with that, but what is being explained I could not find elsewhere so posting with caveat. From what is said about Bryan Pagliano's immunity:

- Immunity can only be granted by a Federal Judge
- A Federal Judge would only grant immunity for prosecutors in a sitting Grand Jury
- Immunity would only be granted if information the witness has would assist prosecution
- Prosecutors grant temporary 1-day immunity to hear what witness-evidence exists prior to full-immunity
- Evidence given by witness would have to be sufficient to indict someone in a Grand Jury

Could be this is going after someone in the staff, but often they will indict in order to force another witness to testify higher up in the chain, so this may be one part of a larger process.

Obviously much of what Napolitano says is complete right wing talking points, but you can filter that out as the process of granting Federal immunity, and what it indicates, is what is noteworthy and I have not seen other information being provided regarding this case. Again, please filter out as needed, especially when he starts talking 'espionage' as I don't think this rises to that of course.... FoxNews-types just can't help themselves.



18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grand Jury Confirmed? Judge Explains How Immunity Indicates Jury Already Seated (Original Post) tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 OP
You are probably better off not watching Fox news for things like this. PoliticAverse Mar 2016 #1
Why are you posting crap like this?? Shameful. riversedge Mar 2016 #2
Oh yes, so incredibly shameful tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #3
Yes, it is. Darb Mar 2016 #6
I don't know, I can't find the boxes tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #7
Oh gawddamn. Darb Mar 2016 #8
The New York Times tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #9
Yeah, I pull articles from the NYT from 1996 out of my butt every day......not. Darb Mar 2016 #10
it was top entry tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #11
Cool story, Bro. Darb Mar 2016 #12
apparently quoting the New York Times is offending you tomm2thumbs Mar 2016 #13
Can you post what Fox thinks about Whitewater? Darb Mar 2016 #14
Also, dig something up on Vince Foster for me. Darb Mar 2016 #15
Travelgate? What about Jennifer Flowers? Darb Mar 2016 #16
Upload your file on Mena, AR ok? Darb Mar 2016 #17
I know you still got that Clinton Murder Poster, can you post it here? Darb Mar 2016 #18
This is bullshit Depaysement Mar 2016 #4
Citing an idiot like Napolitano on DU is sad Gothmog Mar 2016 #5

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. You are probably better off not watching Fox news for things like this.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 04:41 AM
Mar 2016

BTW, what type of immunity did the person receive? "Formal immunity" or "Informal immunity"?

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
8. Oh gawddamn.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 01:46 PM
Mar 2016

1996? Tell me, why do you post the same things that a teabagger would? I wouldn't know where to find that old shit, but you can pull it right out of your ass. Curious that.

Gross.

a thousand times over

Why?

 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
10. Yeah, I pull articles from the NYT from 1996 out of my butt every day......not.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

Articles like that are archived on every Teabagger computer in every teabagger basement. I get that, Baggers are insane, paranoid kooks. But DU members retrieving that shit and coughing it up? That's funny to me.

You obviously cannot make the connection. Is that saved in the Whitewater file or the Vince Foster file?

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
11. it was top entry
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 01:56 PM
Mar 2016

apparently Google is part of your conspiracy - search clinton grand jury new york times

keep trying, or is it nap time for you
 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
12. Cool story, Bro.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:01 PM
Mar 2016

Can you explain why you agree with the Baggers please, and quit obfusgating? Just curious? what other things do you have in common with them? You are parroting their loony Clinton hate, what else? This is important for context don't you think?

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
13. apparently quoting the New York Times is offending you
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:02 PM
Mar 2016

Perhaps you should find other reading appropriate to your level

(actually, your later posts 14-18 seem to answer all the questions anyone might have about your level)

Thanks for confirming
 

Darb

(2,807 posts)
18. I know you still got that Clinton Murder Poster, can you post it here?
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:06 PM
Mar 2016

My Granny had that one on the back of her bathroom door but she has passed. Can you find it for me?

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)
4. This is bullshit
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 07:44 AM
Mar 2016

You don't need a judge to grant immunity. Pagliano probably got letter immunity, not statutory immunity. That means DOJ sent him a letter saying he won't be prosecuted no matter what he says. So none of this proves there is or isn't a grand jury.

Btw, Napolitano was never a federal judge or prosecutor.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Grand Jury Confirmed? Ju...