Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumHillary Caught Slamming Liberal Democrats at Private Fundraiser [AUDIO]
PROOF that Hillary will say ONE thing to your face, and another thing behind your back.* This is the type of blatant 47% issue that you saw happen with Mitt Romney where you CANNOT trust what they tell TO you because they will TELL ANOTHER STORY behind you and not think twice about it.
So....
To all those she has made promises to? FORGET THEM
To all those who think she is on your side? IS SHE REALLY?
To all those Unions who thinks she'll stand up for your rights? WANNA BET?
To all those who think she is going to reign in Wall Street after taking their millions? YEA, RIGHT!
If you choose to vote for this candidate going forward, I wish your conscience well because it may well be contributing to the underlying FRAUD that exists in politics when a candidate will blatantly say one thing to your face and then something entirely different behind your back.
* Clip from 08 when competing against Obama, whom she NOW draws against her body like a policy flak jacket.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)You'll find out a lot about the word "ingratitude".
rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)the more I find out, the more I see how she's a liability to the Democratic Party. I hope Super Delegates are taking note of this, as their loyalties should be to winning the election, not massaging an ego from the past.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)I'm waiting for her full 47% moment though- we know she feels the same about working people as she does about Moveon- they're not important to her and sometimes try to interrupt her gravy train.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)If you have a youtube account, hover your mouse over the bottom, near the right, of the video, while it is playing or paused, until you see "Watch on www.youtube.com". Click on that, and then you can like it (You may be asked to log in. That only takes a second, and you don't leave the page).
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)This could feed the demand to release the transcripts of the Goldman Sachs speeches.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/26/opinion/mrs-clinton-show-voters-those-transcripts.html
AzDar
(14,023 posts)turbinetree
(24,688 posts)I am just trying to remember if Sanders ever, ever ever did this-------------------not in my life time, he has never mentioned that "Trade Deals" are Gold standards or said anything bad about Unions.
I (think questions should be asked in the next debate, if Clinton would go after Taft-Hartley------------its a simple question.
I want to know if she would re-negotiate TPP, Nafta, Cafta, and the "other trade deals'--------------it's real simple.
He has never said anything to Union Members and then turned around and done something else-------------------but the Bernie Sanders supporters are hearing on MSNBC tonight, from the entire Third Way panel of commentators and respondents, like Podesta, that Sanders is a one issue candidate--------------well Podesta, and the commentators and analysts, it is one issue and its called economics 101 and Wall Street, and the simple fact m atter is that, they do not like me, they want my money, and they want me to stay in debt, they don't want me to get an education, unless I spend 5%--- 25% interest loan rates in educations bills, credit cards, cars, houses, ect,, because they like having closed door meetings to keep the status quo---------it (Wall Street) likes to get what they want, and they will pay big money behind closed doors to hear what they want, and get what they want-------------------release the 2013-2014 transcripts, Podesta.
My candidate doesn't have anything to hide (he already has said he would release his information, it's already out there in plain site) ------why does yours, why does your candidate look for political cover by demanding that "everyone" running from the right wing republicans clown show release there's also--------------------
Honk-------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
Jenny_92808
(1,342 posts)Hillary has shown us her works and it is not pretty.
turbinetree
(24,688 posts)it is that simple.
MY continued Rant......................
She helped, by voting YEA to the Iraq debacle, and then, we, the taxpayers are presently footing a bill of over 3 trillion dollars
Then to top it all off, by letting the taxpayers pay death benefits to families 4,685 service personnel that were murdered in the war called Iraq, based on a lie.
Every soldier had to have death insurance, which cost us in this lying war over $468,500,000 with B in billion of dollars--------------why isn't she being asked about this in these debates--------------I don't want to hear that it was a mistake------------------that's not good enough....................I want her to say "I am sorry",
I want to know if she will repeal Taft-Hartley?
That's what one of questions should be on the table------(she knows exactly what that legislation is all about, her answer says everything about her and what she thinks when it comes to Unions in that act)-------------not the same ones being presented by everyone in the MSM, and the audience having there questions screened so the public gets the same old tired answers...........
I want to know if she will re-open these "Trade Deals", and the corruption that is taking this country into the third rate state, because of these "trade deals", it is a simple economic 101 college class subject................
I already know what my Democratic-Socialist candidate will do--------------he has already said he would------------he will go after the "trade deals"---------------It makes economic sense
Honk-----------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)No...More...Clintons.
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)She wasn't attacking all liberal Democrats. She was complaining about MoveOn.org members intimidating her voters. Obviously, they weren't intimidating her voters a year ago so she had nice things to say about them. The Sanders supporters are always talking about honesty, then stuff like this gets posted.
Logical
(22,457 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)never said 'ALL' and yet they start inserting things.... see how this game works
some people have learned a LOT from 'The Clinton Way'
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)the term conveys that she attacked liberals in general. I'm not inserting anything.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)the summary and video explain the entire story, and ALL was never there
maybe it should say 3.2 million liberal Democrats, per Huffington estimate of membership
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)She hates us.
So does her old fundraiser, Rahm Emmanuel. He calls us "retarded".
greymouse
(872 posts)As soon as Obama picked Rahm, I knew he'd deceived liberals.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)try again, or is it too hard to refute video and audio
hmmmmm... I guess we need more clips like this for the political courtroom here
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)so it conveys that she attacked liberal Democrats in general. I'm glad there was a clip. It showed the headline was very misleading. If the tape refutes that, point me to where in it she specifically attacks "liberal Democrats."
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)you switched from actual word 'slammed', to 'ATTACKED'
from 'no' mention of quantity, to 'ALL'
I think you should be writing your own OP's and then you can get the wording just right.
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)Because you are doing a great job at twisting things. Attacked is the same as slammed. I didn't use quotation marks. In general is the same as all, as opposed to one group that is liberal Democrats.
Nobody could get the wording perfect enough that it couldn't be twisted by the methods you are using.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)In general is the same as all.
Attacked is the same as slammed.
I feel for your vocabulary... and yet somehow mine is off.
uh huh
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)just that this post is in conflict.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)You will never find yourself safe.
Pauldg47
(640 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)Hillary is frustrated and is listing why, then expressing who is frustrating her. She doesn't put Move on down now and earlier her comments her comments were supportive of their motivations but still acted like she was frustrated by them. I just don't think it deserves the title you are giving it. Rather than "slamming" she is more pointing out her opinions.
ish of the hammer
(444 posts)so if you don't agree with her and say so, that's "intimidation".
berniebros anyone, the game is getting old.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)I guess dishonesty has two masters
yuiyoshida
(41,829 posts)TWEETED!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)No nation-state attacked us on 9/11. Afghanistan hardly even had a functional central government at the time of 9/11.
It could hardly be accurately said that they were harboring terrorists. But this country (TPTB, Neo-Cons) wanted any bullshit excuse for going to war after 9/11, the quicker the better. (Why was that?)
They had to hurry up and profit from war? WTactualF?
And Hillary? People, come on. Can't you see through her by now? I cannot fathom how she has ANY support.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)the history of countries fighting there could not be ignored. No one ever won...
So, did the PTB expect that the USA,LLC would be different and win?
OR did they accept extended war and plan on it(the CIA already controlled the opium) to build their coffers with a bit more $$$.
In the big picture, it seems obvious.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)I believe you are right. The CIA is bringing in heroin, not only to pay for covert operations, but also to line their own pockets. I believe this has been SOP since Nam.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)after he fooled most of the voters into believing he would end the war.
Just another Republican liar & crook.
Duval
(4,280 posts)Response to tomm2thumbs (Original post)
Post removed
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)progressives have no where else to go. They might be in for a shock. People are fed up with this crap.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Ino
(3,366 posts)of course she's going to slam them and get revenge any way she can.
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)and then some!
think
(11,641 posts)mountain grammy
(26,605 posts)I think our foreign policy has, for the most part, been a disaster. She thinks it's just fine.
That said, I don't like this kind of thing. She can be candid in a closed room with her own supporters, and she didn't say anything that bad.
dchill
(38,462 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)What else are people supposed to be driven by when they make voting choices? Whose turn someone thinks it is?
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)The Queen has spoken her edict on a hot mic. . .time to throw liberals under the bus. The proud Goldwater Girl and former Wal-mart board of directors members that loves her some Henry Kissinger has given the marching orders.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)but it will go to waste in a Hillary White House as she'll be off doing her own thing instead of trying to make great changes happen in America
downeastdaniel
(497 posts)You're The Hill, it's not the way she rolls...
Lorien
(31,935 posts)it's amazing how this isn't obvious to everyone. Her actions, the bribery, what she says behind closed doors...how much more evidence do you need?