![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | OP |
forest444 | Mar 2016 | #1 | |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody | Mar 2016 | #2 | |
cprise | Mar 2016 | #7 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #8 | |
cprise | Mar 2016 | #16 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #18 | |
cprise | Mar 2016 | #20 | |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody | Mar 2016 | #22 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #23 | |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody | Mar 2016 | #28 | |
Elmer S. E. Dump | Mar 2016 | #3 | |
Ned_Devine | Mar 2016 | #6 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #9 | |
Elmer S. E. Dump | Mar 2016 | #11 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #12 | |
Elmer S. E. Dump | Mar 2016 | #13 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #14 | |
Elmer S. E. Dump | Mar 2016 | #15 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #17 | |
Elmer S. E. Dump | Mar 2016 | #19 | |
SCantiGOP | Mar 2016 | #34 | |
cprise | Mar 2016 | #25 | |
truebrit71 | Mar 2016 | #27 | |
stonecutter357 | Mar 2016 | #4 | |
melman | Mar 2016 | #5 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #10 | |
yuiyoshida | Mar 2016 | #21 | |
Lodestar | Mar 2016 | #24 | |
SunSeeker | Mar 2016 | #26 | |
truebrit71 | Mar 2016 | #29 | |
stevenleser | Mar 2016 | #31 | |
truebrit71 | Mar 2016 | #32 | |
DemonGoddess | Mar 2016 | #30 | |
ihaveaquestion | Mar 2016 | #33 | |
ismnotwasm | Mar 2016 | #35 |
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 08:05 PM
forest444 (5,902 posts)
1. Congrats, Steve!
You look like a million, and sound even better.
As for Trump, when the Cambridge dictionary issues its next edition they should put his face in front of the word misogyny. |
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 08:32 PM
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (16,399 posts)
2. NEWSMAX?
Jesus, why???????
|
Response to ProudToBeBlueInRhody (Reply #2)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:15 PM
cprise (8,445 posts)
7. They're like the web version of Fox.
![]() |
Response to ProudToBeBlueInRhody (Reply #2)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:22 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
8. Same reason Sanders went to Liberty University.
I don't believe it moves the needle at all to go on Liberal networks.
The best chance you have of making a difference is to tell the truth to Conservatives and make a good argument for it. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #8)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:50 PM
cprise (8,445 posts)
16. That's rather presumptuous, to think you represent
a direction for that needle, moreso while trashing talking about Sanders.
The piece reminds me of that token liberal that Fox used to trot out... |
Response to cprise (Reply #16)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:52 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
18. It's rather contradictory to discuss Sanders as a man of the people and then
Treat him like a king and chastise someone for trying to do the same thing.
Besides which, Sanders isn't that good of a debater. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #18)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:02 PM
cprise (8,445 posts)
20. No, the problem is you were wrong, which makes it a smear.
Think about that the next time you are 'representing the left' for the benefit of a fake-leftist corporate aristocrat who is shoveling Wall St. money at the media to buy herself some popularity.
I just can't wait to see what's on tap the next time Clinton is calling for more war. She is half-way up PNAC's checklist. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #8)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:14 PM
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (16,399 posts)
22. The people who watch Newsmax are unreachable
I'd concede Fox viewers may have some strays who can be convinced otherwise, but you have to be a real fucking nut to watch Newsmax.
|
Response to ProudToBeBlueInRhody (Reply #22)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:17 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
23. More so than the students at Liberty University? I doubt it. nt
Response to stevenleser (Reply #23)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 12:14 AM
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (16,399 posts)
28. A lot of students at Liberty might not give a fig about politics
I found it a pointless exercise, but I bet it's easier to turn a religious but non political person on to socialist economic policy than turning a person on to even moderate Democratic views who goes to Newsmax because FAUX isn't right wing enough.
|
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 08:37 PM
Elmer S. E. Dump (5,751 posts)
3. I thought your comments about Bernie supporters was garbage
Bernie NEVER promised anything other than to work toward those goals. In order for that to happen there has to be more progressives elected to congress and senate. He's completely realistic, while you were very disingenuous on that show. I'm just glad nobody watches that RWNJ channel.
|
Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #3)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:10 PM
Ned_Devine (3,146 posts)
6. He trash talked Bernie supporters? I couldn't watch
This dude's just a sellout anyway, so I wouldn't lose sleep
|
Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #3)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:23 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
9. All of which Bernie has done nothing about. He's selling a bill of goods. And I'm not
buying.
|
Response to stevenleser (Reply #9)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:25 PM
Elmer S. E. Dump (5,751 posts)
11. That's where you lie. He never PROMISED anything to gullible people.
That's your BS story and you keep sticking to it, Hillary.
|
Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #11)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:28 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
12. That's what a platform is and I am sure we can all recite the highlights of his platform.
If he hasn't promised to do it, what is his fallback plan? If and when he fails to get single payer, what's his plan B? How about a $15 minimum wage? What will he settle for?
It's not as sexy to promise more realistic goals so he doesn't bother with that. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #12)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:36 PM
Elmer S. E. Dump (5,751 posts)
13. You are just a typical Hillary "we can't do it" apologist.
And your bullshit "promise" word has never been uttered by Bernie about anything other than he will work hard towards these goals. Goals are not immediate. We are adult enough to know this. Problem is, we also know everything we need to know about Hillary. Good night.
|
Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #13)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:41 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
14. That's three separate arguments now that you have fallen back on to the same question.
It's really simple. Reply with the names of the GOP committee members who vote to move Bernies bills out of committee and also with the requisite number of Republican house members overall who vote for the bills in a full House up and down vote.
If you can't do that, and we all know you can't, my point is made. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #14)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:49 PM
Elmer S. E. Dump (5,751 posts)
15. You are being purposefully obtuse. Good night.
Response to Elmer S. E. Dump (Reply #15)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:50 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
17. Nope, I'm being realistic and making empirical arguments. nt
Response to stevenleser (Reply #17)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:55 PM
Elmer S. E. Dump (5,751 posts)
19. Good Night, Sir! n/t
![]() |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #17)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 11:46 AM
SCantiGOP (13,125 posts)
34. Good job, Steven
Keep up the good fight and ignore the snark you get here.
|
Response to stevenleser (Reply #14)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:43 PM
cprise (8,445 posts)
25. He's calling you out on the same fib you made in the RW news clip
which you refuse to acknowledge because you think oversimplifying Bernie's position to push a falsehood is acceptable.
Throwing some non-sequitur quiz in his face is pretty entertaining though. Its like NewsMax found a new soulmate. |
Response to stevenleser (Reply #9)
truebrit71 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 08:38 PM
stonecutter357 (12,492 posts)
4. K&R!
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 08:48 PM
melman (7,681 posts)
5. Newsmax , Fox
You show up in some interesting places.
|
Response to melman (Reply #5)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:23 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
10. Yes, I do. nt
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:12 PM
yuiyoshida (40,267 posts)
21. Well all I can say is...
at least those Cherry Blossoms looked nice. Sakura wa kieri desune.
|
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:23 PM
Lodestar (2,388 posts)
24. In polls (Trump/Clinton) "..doing the best and yet have the HIGHEST unfavorability ratings".
Why is that? I would like to hear the answer.
Something about that just doesn't add up. |
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 11:40 PM
SunSeeker (49,133 posts)
26. Good job, Steven!
![]() |
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 12:19 AM
truebrit71 (20,805 posts)
29. Here's you in 2008 calling Hillary a liar. Care to tell us on which date she stopped lying?
Or is it that get lies or more acceptable this time around?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=658816 |
Response to truebrit71 (Reply #29)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:24 AM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
31. Already discussed in my sig line. I've told you this several times now. At this point
you are stalking and harassing me.
|
Response to stevenleser (Reply #31)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:17 AM
truebrit71 (20,805 posts)
32. I have them switched off. Care to answer properly?
...FYI, you haven't told me ONCE...
|
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 08:19 AM
DemonGoddess (4,640 posts)
30. Good job Steven!
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 09:43 AM
ihaveaquestion (1,818 posts)
33. Young people don't just what free stuff!
They're smart and they think for themselves - Shame on you for implying otherwise.
Try reading up about young voters from someone who has insight... http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016148935 |
Response to stevenleser (Original post)
Sat Mar 26, 2016, 01:11 PM
ismnotwasm (40,968 posts)
35. K&R
Excellent Job!
|