Video & Multimedia

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts) Fri May 13, 2016, 02:57 PM May 2016

And now Debbie Wasserman Shultz won't debate!

Just look at her sanctimonious look when Steve asks her about debating, and how she refuses to answer, but actually says 'no' she won't be debating her opponent! Such arrogance.
Sending Tim Canova another five dollars!

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And now Debbie Wasserman Shultz won't debate! (Original Post) ViseGrip May 2016 OP

Kick....to pressure her into debating, something she said before should be natural. ViseGrip May 2016 #1

Whatever that was that was oozing through her pores was noxious me b zola May 2016 #2

Right-wingers don't care about democracy Rass May 2016 #3

Bingo! trof May 2016 #10

already posted passiveporcupine May 2016 #4

Well, DUH. The WINNING candidate avoids debates, the LOSING one dogs for/demands them. MADem May 2016 #5

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #11

Pol Sc 101. Hortensis May 2016 #12

FIRE DWS! Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here Omaha Steve May 2016 #6

Go Tim Go! floppyboo May 2016 #7

But debates are GOOD for the PARTY. I thought I heard HER say that. Joob May 2016 #8

I love it!!! SmittynMo May 2016 #9

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)

1. Kick....to pressure her into debating, something she said before should be natural.

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 03:12 PM

May 2016

She's too busy running the party, Hillary's campaign, and 'focusing on her constituents', but she has time to go on TV shows nightly.

me b zola

(19,053 posts)

2. Whatever that was that was oozing through her pores was noxious

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 03:12 PM

May 2016

Her and Hillary both. They don't need to campaign they are too powerful for that. Get out of my way!

Rass

(112 posts)

3. Right-wingers don't care about democracy

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 03:13 PM

May 2016

Right-wingers like Hillary and Shultz simply do not care about democracy. That is a progressive ideal.

trof

(54,256 posts)

10. Bingo!

Reply to Rass (Reply #3)

Fri May 13, 2016, 06:25 PM

May 2016

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)

4. already posted

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 03:19 PM

May 2016

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017370435

She is not saying 'she won't debate him', she just won't answer the question period. She may end up being forced into a debate. I hope so. But I don't even know if I could watch it. Her weasel words are just too hard to listen to. She learned that from Hillary.

MADem

(135,425 posts)

5. Well, DUH. The WINNING candidate avoids debates, the LOSING one dogs for/demands them.

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 03:30 PM

May 2016

That's POLISCI 101. Not rocket science at all.

Response to MADem (Reply #5)

Post removed

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)

12. Pol Sc 101.

Reply to MADem (Reply #5)

Sat May 14, 2016, 04:06 PM

May 2016

Just what I was going to say.

Omaha Steve

(99,494 posts)

6. FIRE DWS! Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 03:56 PM

May 2016

Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova

floppyboo

(2,461 posts)

7. Go Tim Go!

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 05:36 PM

May 2016

best wishes in unseating this congresswoman. Can she still be DNC chair if she doesn't have a seat?

Joob

(1,065 posts)

8. But debates are GOOD for the PARTY. I thought I heard HER say that.

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 05:42 PM

May 2016

SmittynMo

(3,544 posts)

9. I love it!!!

Reply to ViseGrip (Original post)

Fri May 13, 2016, 06:03 PM

May 2016

She's freaking out. Hey, what goes around, comes around. Are you ready Debbie? I mean, omg, 3 times repeating the SOS. She's obviously not ready for prime time.

Reply to this discussion