Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumHave you seen how outrageous the women of The View were to Bernie?
Have you seen how outrageous the women of The View were to Bernie? All of them, but the most terrible part was this one, when Joy told Bernie "Let's just forget about the war in Iraq". I bet she wouldn't be saying that if her son had died in this war. I guess these "feminists" find it fit to stand up for their candidate by being insensitive to all those veterans alive ( and all the dead and fucked up ones) who should have never gone there. Shame on these women
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
LiberalArkie
(15,708 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)KeepItReal
(7,769 posts)Give some examples of how Senator Sanders has disrespected or slighted or gave offense to "the first woman with a real chance of becoming President".
You do realize you have to support your arguments here, right?
Javaman
(62,510 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)And he went after Planned Parenthood for endorsing her over him. When he said nothing while his campaign staffer said 'we might think about making her VP", when she was far far far ahead of him, when he called her 'unqualified' simply because she did not rush to endorse his qualifications and said the voters would decide on qualifications. All that kinda pissed women off.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)OMG! Call the police! Bernie didn't say something again!
From the start, I have never seen so much rending of garments over what Sanders DIDN'T say.
"Did you hear what Bernie didn't say today? It's so disrespectful! How dare he not say that!"
Well, if Clinton becomes president, I suppose we'll go to war if some leader points their finger at her.
Bodych
(133 posts)As much as Team Hillary wants it to be credential, it's not. Sorry.
riversedge
(70,182 posts)Last edited Fri May 27, 2016, 06:35 AM - Edit history (2)
edited to insert missed word.
Bodych
(133 posts)As much as I hate resorting to personal insults the way you attempted to do with me, sometimes you Team Hillary players demand it.
riversedge
(70,182 posts)forgot a word and have now inserted it.
Bodych
(133 posts)...but before I add you to my IL:
It is how Hillary is treating the first Jew with a real chance of becoming President.
I didn't say that religion is a credential, but I sure as hell implied it.
Good bye.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Now Hillary should be treated as something special? Why should Senator Sanders treat her any different than he would treat any other candidate running?
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)So I use profanity in the work place around men, it's okay to still use it around women who find it offensive? Okay.
So, I touch men on the shoulders at work all the time, it's okay to do the same to my female co-workers? alright.
So, I tell obscene jokes and talk about my time at the strip club last weekend around my male friends, so the women folk should just suck it up and be fine with that too??
It's called being a civilized person in a modern society.
Women in the work place have changed the rules of behavior at work and in society. Evolve past the 1950's level of arguments, or maybe you'd be more comfortable in that other party that likes to marginalize women?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)And thanks for not addressing the question I asked.
Does she want special treatment because she's a woman or does she want equal treatment? You can't just toss out the sexism card and have it both ways when you find it more convenient.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Especially when it concerns areas where they've been marginalized.
WTF do you think affirmative action is for? Do you think people people of minority races can't claim racism and justify affirmative action at the same time??
WTF do you think EEOP laws are for?
WTF do you think hate crimes are for?
WTF do you think sexual harrassment laws are for?
People from minority groups that have a very well documented and established history of being marginalized DO get additional considerations, and frankly if you don't feel they are at all justified then perhaps you'd fit in better at Ann Coulters website, or free republic, because anyone that uses the logic you are using will fit in much better in those places imo.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)BTW- EEOP stands for EQUAL Employment Opportunity Program. Not Special Employment Opportunity Program.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)to call equality "special treatment."
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)Example 1: Colin Powell, working under the 1950 public records act, can put all his non-classified emails on a private server instead of a .gov account and make no copies and DELETE them all when he leaves office. But when Hillary Clinton, working under the exact same 1950 public records act, puts her non-classified emails on a private server instead of a .gov account, and saves them, and even prints them all out (as the law requires) -- then she's a TERRIBLE PERSON.
Example 2: Every Presidential candidate since 1976 has released multiple years of tax returns. Hillary beat them all by releasing 30 years worth, including years when neither of them were in public office. Bernie doesn't want to release more than one year of his, so he's trying to distract from that by demanding to see Hillary's speech transcripts. Even though no Presidential candidate has ever been asked to do so before. Even though many candidates in the past have delivered paid speeches (John Kerry did while he was still in the Senate because it was legal then.) No, this is just a special, made-up requirement for the first woman ever to get this far in the Democratic primaries.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Because...yknow... women are too sensitive to hear profanity or obscene jokes. Talk of a strip club might send them into hysterics!
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)I guess those pesky laws and protections should just be removed from the books.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Your strawman construction does not pass even a cursory inspection. Epic fail.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Do feel free to make a more informed comment.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)So why are Dem delegates abandoning bernie again? Duh.
If he can't handle the Women of the View, how's he going to handle Trump's at Trump's Big Charitable Debate PR Show.
Wonder what The Donald will tell Bernie when he shoves his wagging finger in Trump's face like he did to Hillary?
This will be comedy gold for SNL
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Just kidding, they're old pals.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)And here I thought she voted for the war for political reasons, just like all of the other Democratic candidates that ran in '08 that were able to vote on the resolution.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)She voted to send a bunch of poor and middle class kids to a clusterfuck in the middle east because she was afraid of voter sentiment at the time. However being a casualty of the election process is not more important than sending people to be a casualty of war.
However her daughter went from college to working for a hedge fund rather than the military.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)and make money. She has never had confidence to find her own voice and stand out against the majority
treestar
(82,383 posts)You mean you don't think representatives should pay any attention to the voters?
KPN
(15,642 posts)Some folks just have an axe to grind.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)...he is to not agree to a coronation.
(FYI--Feminist women here voting for Bernie.)
coco77
(1,327 posts)because we are women we are suppose to automatically vote for her. Its about the issues.
merrily
(45,251 posts)This has been my general impression of her for a long time.
But, that is one dumb comment! You cannot dismiss the importance of a war vote or get a mulligan on a war vote. That is really another reason I want Hillary to lose: That politicians stop seeing voting FOR a war as a safer choice for a politician than voting against a war. I think the war vote did cost Hillary votes in 2008. I wish it had cost her more votes in 2016.
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)and increased over the last few weeks in particular. People like Joy should speak to Hillary about this, not Bernie. HC's campaign weaknesses including high unfavorables and invisibility are her own making, not Bernie's.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)You're right, they're taking their fears out on the wrong guy.
Everyone needs to step back and realize the fucking truth.
Had Bernie not even EXISTED, Hillary's baggage would STILL have us in this spot. It's just that Bernie's telling us HEY, SHE IS A SINKING SHIP!
And he didn't make it that way, that's just what is happening!
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)and her very own creation. It's essentially a matter of how bad is it, in relation to other candidates I think. But once you've tried the Truck-Bernie brand things will never be the same!
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)I'm adding that to my moniker for her - WJC-HRC Inc. Since 1979
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)The women,including Behar were very accepting and encouraging. In fact they fell all over him.
His last visit was different . They feel like a lot of people that he is a problem now.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)So i deleted my daily recording of the show. Maybe I'll watch again in a few months. I'll miss Whoopie and Raven tho
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)nxylas
(6,440 posts)But the outcome was pre-determined. They were nice to Bernie before because it was in their owners' interests at the time to maintain the fiction that voters had a choice.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Cause he's still in the race. They just ASS U ME D that he'd have dropped out by now because he couldn't get any votes. Whoops. They ASS U ME D wrong.
He happens to be the voice of a very large group of people who are very happy he's willing to fight as hard as he has, in spite of it being such an uphill race. He's had the courage of a lion endure this far, and he is still courageous. He's not a giver upper...unlike some of the things Hillary has given up on, like single payer health care.
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)They were asking him about why he was staying in and he started on his repeated speech. He is better than Hillary because he voted against
Iraq.
That is when Joy said forget the war. She meant don't change the subject.
He sounded like Trump.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Hillary's BAD SELF-SERVING JUDGEMENTS are the subject.
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)She was saying Stick to the topic.
coco77
(1,327 posts)even the Republicons are mentioning him more and calling him names.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)young people and is at least in part the reason for many of our economic problems.
I do not watch The View but that woman is one of the most stupid women I have heard in a long time.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Not ALL, but too many.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Millions of dead men killed in wars don't count as actual victims in her universe, because...they're men.
gaspee
(3,231 posts)Are killed in war than soldiers - and most of those civilians are women and children.
For example - 62% of the people of the millions killed in WWII were civilians.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)It's more dangerous to be in a war than to be a civilian. And the male/female ration of civilians is the male/female ratio of the population, minus the male/female components that are in the military. You lumped children in with women, whereas about half of those children are male.
What you're really saying is that 38% of the people killed in WWII were military, almost all of who were men. The civilian contingent would be split fairly evenly between men/women, with some tilt towards women because more men are in the military.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)Months ago, Joy was all over Bernie. She absolutely adored him. Not so much anymore. So what changed? I'm guessing she was told "get in line" with the establishment, or else.
It's quite sad witnessing the corruption that is going on during this election.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Perhaps she thinks it's time to concentrate on Trump?
LisaM
(27,800 posts)He made some very misleading statements about it on "The View" and they probably didn't forget it.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Good point!
Maybe Sanders and Trump should have a debate or something! Right?.... Right?
retrowire
(10,345 posts)Response to retrowire (Reply #24)
Post removed
frankieallen
(583 posts)And he is hurting the party by pretending he has an inkling of a friggin chance. Get out Bernie, so we can concentrate on the general election, and TRUMP!
LS_Editor
(893 posts)Fuck the victims on both sides.
And the fact HRC is a hawk, who never saw a military intervention she didn't like since she was elected a U.S. senator.
Fuck the corporate media, and the clapping fools who enable it.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Bern's got his own hands deep in the MIC pockets as well.
Lockheed delivers the bombs that kills all those Iraqis you lay at Hillary's feet.
Bernie walked in lockstep with Lockheed & the MIC.
Don't forget that part when you're laying the entire ME War on Hillary.
Btw it was Bush's War.
LS_Editor
(893 posts)Unlike Bernie Sanders, who doesn't seem to have a voting record of using the weapons you are bitching about - you know, unlike Hillary Clinton.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)That will never be used is tantamount to lying or being willfully ignorant for political reasons that killed hundreds of thousands of lives?
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Whoo hoo..heck of a job bern!
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Those planes will not be used in war, if Hillary is president, they most certainly will be used.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Too bad all those VT families will be outta work!
Well I guess bern could always get his army of bros to just yell the terrorists away.
Ya, like bern's going to order all wars to stop.
Nice dream.
HillareeeHillaraah
(685 posts)...the rest of the planet would simply stop fighting, don'tcha know?
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)I don't, but Bernie doesn't have the same war hawk tendencies that Hillary Clinton has.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,169 posts)You don't believe in having a standing army, that includes fighter jets?
Or you just don't want jets built in Vermont?
Are you just as vocal on your anti-weapons rant about Hillary's New York State's military contractors?
Here's one:
http://www.wescomfginc.com/flash_index.html
NoMoreRepugs
(9,401 posts)not sure who is 'laying the entire ME War on Hillary'...... only a maroon
would do that...
zeemike
(18,998 posts)To show us how tough she is...just like the men who were war presidents.
That is what should concern us...but those who think it is great will never have to go to war or suffer from it. They will live safely in their gated communities with their well paid jobs while people die for them.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)After all it wasn't that big of a deal.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)glinda
(14,807 posts)becoming very aggressive, bitchy and bossy. Even to me if I show support for Sen. Sanders. I was recently attacked over and over again on my FB page also.
It sort of reminds me of when several of the women I worked with years ago...well our menses all co-ordinated eventually.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)glinda
(14,807 posts)words.
When someone attacks a person in a bullying and bossy manner just because they support another candidate or ideas is insane. Poor form anyways. It really is sad. I usually try to give others some respect unlike some people.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Uh.... you left out the "some".... a small but important word.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)I think you missed my point AlbertCat. When was the last time you saw anyone say, let alone post, that men, or even just "some men," are "aggressive, bitchy and bossy." Those words are reserved for punishing and shaming assertive women. The epithets are plainly sexist.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Well, we just had a whole thread on how Sanders and Trump debating was all "white male privilege".
"The epithets are plainly sexist."
When one is playing the sex card....of course they are.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Why accuse a woman pointing out sexist language of "playing the sex card"? Are you try to shame me for being a feminist?
glinda
(14,807 posts)Like bullying, mean, hostile, aggressive attacks using "being female" as the rational for verbally abusing another female. Doesn't bother some that have attacked me that I am a female.I am tired of the behavior and have been the brunt of it way more than I would like to say since I think SOME women should be beyond this and not attack other females especially in their own "spaces online".
That is all I was trying to say. It is abusive. And very very very angry.
If a person wants me to vote for some one else I would think presenting their best side rather than coming at me with attacks would be more convincing. And appreciated.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)When you use sex-specific epithets, you attack not only that person, but that entire sex. Such language implies the behavior you are unhappy with is related to them being female.
glinda
(14,807 posts)Was using it in an Urban sort of usage. I forgot how it came off as it is also used to both sexes. Although yes it is viewed as you say. But yes I could have used other words like "violent abusive verbal assaults meant to intimidate" or "threatening" or something.
But whatever the term I hope some can get the point that I am sick of this behavior that only happened during this election cycle. To me anyways with no provocation.
But I have sat long enough putting up with it and no more. No one deserves abuse and bullying.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)But you clearly have the eloquence to stand up for yourself and say what you want to say, as your above post demonstrates, without resorting to language that puts all women down...even in an "Urban usage" setting.
glinda
(14,807 posts)But PS. I do not identify with any group such as feminist or any.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)but her actions as SOS clearly show she didn't. She is still a war hawk.
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)Last edited Thu May 26, 2016, 02:48 PM - Edit history (1)
Horrible, horrible wars...forget about them. We've got a glass ceiling to break.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Drones are very good at breaking ceilings...
retrowire
(10,345 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)Paladin
(28,246 posts)For shame.
greiner3
(5,214 posts)Considering you apparently consider Hillary as such
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Now ... You are pitiful ...
Gone .... For good ...
Paladin
(28,246 posts)theaocp
(4,235 posts)maybe we just let that go already, amiright? What an unbelievably ignorant fucking comment.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Bernies facial expression after hearing that we should just forget about the Iraq war is utter disgust. And rightfully so!!
What she said there really boils down to: "why are talking about a few thousand dead American soldiers and a few hundred thousand dead Iraqis?!? It is hurting Hillary, so let's forget about all those that died and back Hillary!!"
ETA: Even the audience that was clapping was hesitant, it sounded like the stage director or whatever the position is called signaled the audience to clap and they hesitated.
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)To say that we should just forget about a horrible war - a horrible ongoing war - that's a sickening thing to say. Bernie let Joy off too easily, but maybe he was just stunned by that remark..
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)The face he made said it all. How anyone could defend what Joy said is either ignorant or lying.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)This is an actual thing that happens on all live TV, y'know.
Anyone who has been in the audience for a live TV show knows there's an audience liaison...who pumps them up and indeed tells them when to react.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Cheered the Women, even!!
Good for them.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Thousands of innocent lives that were murdered get in the way of Hillary's presidency?!
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)she voted for the IRW, the purpose of which was to put pressure on Iraq to let the UN WMD inspectors in. It isn't Hillary's fault that Bush disregarded the conditions in the IWR and, 6 months later, went to war before the inspections were completed.
And if Hillary, Biden, Kerry, and every other Dem voted against the IRW, it would have made no difference at all. The incoming Congress in January would have given Bush a blank check IWR for his war, and he would have gone to war in March anyway.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)The state that was most impacted by the terror attacks on 9/11, if she stood up and fought against the war in Iraq, that would have been a clarion call to the American people that we should not go into Iraq. But she didn't and hundreds of thousands died from the cowardice of all the Democrats that did not fight back to prevent the invasion.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)and nothing the junior Senator from NY could have said would have stopped them from authorizing that war.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)She just left the white house a few years prior and was one of the most powerful and well known Democrats and women at the time. If she stood up to the Republicans she would have had swayed the minds of the people that were being lied to by the Republicans.
robbob
(3,524 posts)...and there is nothing you can do to stop it, that means you shouldn't speak out against it? At least go on the record as being against it? Or instead speak out FOR it, since there is nothing you can do to stop it?
That's messed up, man.
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)or Biden, or the other Democrats.
robbob
(3,524 posts)(back in Canada now, thank God), and the spinelessness of ALL the Democratic representatives who refused to stand up to BushCo at the time because of the "political mood" after 9/11 sickened me then, as it still does to this day.
They aren't running for President at the moment, but if they were I would hope to see the same criticism regarding the IWR.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Very interesting.
robbob
(3,524 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 1, 2016, 12:59 AM - Edit history (1)
Some mind reading trick. But the truth of the matter is I moved back to my home in Canada in 2002 after the USA invaded Iraq. I marched many miles through Boston in order to protest the upcoming war, and saw B* on Tv denouncing all the hundreds of thousands of Americans as some "focus group". The day the invasion actually took place I walked into my boss's office and told him I was heading back home, and walking away from an 80K/year job. He said he wished he could join me.
After I moved back I spent the next several years decompressing and really didn't pay much attention to the 2004 elections, although I had a strong feeling B* would win again, and felt Kerry was a very weak candidate to take him on.
I will give you this: I don't recall anyone making much of a fuss over Kerry's vote on the IWR. Maybe 2 years into the war the true horror over one of the most costly and foolish blunders in American history had yet to sink in? Maybe if he were running for POTUS today people would be more critical? Or maybe it IS because people are looking for something to bash Hillary with, and maybe another candidate wouldn't be criticized like this.
I don't know the answer, and you don't either, but I do know this: the invasion of Iraq was a great evil, voting for the IWR was WRONG, and once the invasion occurred politicians should have had the courage to speak out against it.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Still anyone standing on the IWR vote as disqualifying should not have voted for Kerry either. And he ran closer to the vote.
treestar
(82,383 posts)That's all it would have taken to turn the post 911 nation into peaceable doves?
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)Once that illegal and immoral war started, it was every Senator's duty to stand up and loudly denounce it. Hillary did NOTHING.
This is not a knock against Hillary specifically. Most politicians did nothing, either because they actually agreed with the war, or they felt that opposing it would harm them politically.
Agreeing with the war, or putting politics before belief...either possibility is repulsive.
But there is a third possibility, that the politician in question was honorable, but was fooled by Bush. That is not repulsive, but it is a huge negative in my book, too huge for me to get past.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Or in the formal legalese, the "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002"
I can see how Clinton might be confused into thinking it isn't a war resolution or a resolution for the use of military force against Iraq. Clearly, Bush is too clever for her by far.
(cough)
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Now back to cutting excuses for why it's okay to erase the lives of half a million human beings because their deaths are an inconvenience for Hillary Clinton.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Bern welcomed tge F-35 into his state.
Remember that Lockheed & the MIC builds the planes & drops the bombs that kill all those Iraqis you lay at Hillarys feet.
Bernie backs the MIC that dropped the bombs that killed those Iraqis.
See how it works?
Berns got blood on his hands as well.
Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Is fighting to not have to use those poorly designed jets, so chances are they never will be used to murder innocent people.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Gave them his blessing thru the MIC funding bill from day one of Bush's war.
So he said no to war but then votes to fund the MIC that kills the Iraqis.
Go bern!
Bye.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)She championed the Iraq invasion. Once the president is given war powers by congress, congress must then fund said endeavor. Bernie supported the troops that were committed but opposed the war. There's a major difference that seems to be going right over your head.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Buh Bye!
Plonk
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Today it's Maddow and Joy and counting.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)about foreign policy, guess this program is where he wanted to talk about his foreign policy.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)But I get your sentiment. I haven't watched any news at all on television in years.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)It's time to put it to rest already!
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)riversedge
(70,182 posts)duty to rake Hillary over the coals every chance he gets for the resolution vote.
Shemp Howard
(889 posts)That sounds like a pretty coherent foreign policy to me.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)UMTerp01
(1,048 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)too bad for you
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)yea that's it, who cares about about whole countries destroyed--move on, next!!
just in case.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)"Just let it go"? This ain't "Frozen" and you ain't Princess Elsa, Joy. What the fuck is wrong with you, just let it go?
For fuck's sake.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)Trump is a whiney little girl
demwing
(16,916 posts)why would anyone care what those people think or say?