Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumHillary Won’t Say How Much Cash Her Son-in-Law GOT FROM GOLDMAN SACHS
https://vimeo.com/168398308
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1337 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Won’t Say How Much Cash Her Son-in-Law GOT FROM GOLDMAN SACHS (Original Post)
DemMomma4Sanders
May 2016
OP
is there a flow chart of how often certain things are to be repeated on the Du lol nt
msongs
May 2016
#1
Why isn't she required....I mean I know criminals rarely willingly volunteer information but........
DemMomma4Sanders
Jun 2016
#4
He's not running for office. Why are his financial affairs any of your business? n/t
Lil Missy
Jun 2016
#6
msongs
(67,394 posts)1. is there a flow chart of how often certain things are to be repeated on the Du lol nt
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)2. Would you please enlighten us all ...
... as to how Hillary is obliged to disclose the details of a business transaction she was not a party to?
It's a question I've asked of the others who have posted OPs on this topic - and I've yet to get an answer.
Perhaps you are the one who can shed some light on this whole non-matter.
DemMomma4Sanders
(274 posts)4. Why isn't she required....I mean I know criminals rarely willingly volunteer information but........
This time, the Democratic presidential front-runner is accused of giving special government access to an investor in a deep-sea mining company due to his ties to Clinton's son-in-law, hedge fund manager Marc Mezvinsky.
The group, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics on Monday, alleging that Clinton "gave a private company special access to the State Department based upon the company's relationships with Secretary Clinton's family members and donors to the Clinton Foundation."
The complaint, first obtained by TIME, comes two weeks after one of Clinton's court-ordered email releases showed that she asked a senior State Department official to follow up on a special request from Mezvinsky, the husband of her daughter, Chelsea Clinton.
http://www.people.com/article/hillary-clinton-ethics-investigation-son-in-law-marc-mezvinksy-favor
The group, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of Government Ethics on Monday, alleging that Clinton "gave a private company special access to the State Department based upon the company's relationships with Secretary Clinton's family members and donors to the Clinton Foundation."
The complaint, first obtained by TIME, comes two weeks after one of Clinton's court-ordered email releases showed that she asked a senior State Department official to follow up on a special request from Mezvinsky, the husband of her daughter, Chelsea Clinton.
http://www.people.com/article/hillary-clinton-ethics-investigation-son-in-law-marc-mezvinksy-favor
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)5. "A conservative watchdog group ...
... is calling for a new federal investigation into Hillary Clinton's actions during her time as secretary of state."
They can "call for" whatever they want to - it is meaningless.
In addition, the OP is about how "Hillary Wont Say How Much Cash Her Son-in-Law GOT FROM GOLDMAN SACHS". I doubt she would know - she wasn't part of the transaction - and she has no authority to disclose the details of a business arrangement between two other parties.
BTW, this is OLD news - if you can even qualify it as "news" at all.
They can "call for" whatever they want to - it is meaningless.
In addition, the OP is about how "Hillary Wont Say How Much Cash Her Son-in-Law GOT FROM GOLDMAN SACHS". I doubt she would know - she wasn't part of the transaction - and she has no authority to disclose the details of a business arrangement between two other parties.
BTW, this is OLD news - if you can even qualify it as "news" at all.
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)3. I wish people would stop using V&MM
to sneak around GDP.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)6. He's not running for office. Why are his financial affairs any of your business? n/t
DemMomma4Sanders
(274 posts)7. She used her position to get him capital
she voted to bail out this bank....its illegal beyond a dout.
Considering Hillaries connections w bug banks she should have recused herself from any bank related matters.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)8. Got any proof it was illegal? Were there others who voted the same way?
You guys are getting so desperate.