Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

thomhartmann

(3,979 posts) Mon Jun 20, 2016, 05:03 PM Jun 2016

Insurance Exec Writes EPIC Letter About Gov. Brownback & Kansas' Failed Economy!

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Insurance Exec Writes EPIC Letter About Gov. Brownback & Kansas' Failed Economy! (Original Post) thomhartmann Jun 2016 OP

The Brownback playbook is being used by Bevin in KY. But Bevin will likely end being removed tonyt53 Jun 2016 #1

They'd do better to replace the voting machines that said he won his election. Stevepol Jun 2016 #3

Brownback has destroyed Kansas for reg people but the super rich don't care bjobotts Jun 2016 #2

tonyt53

(5,737 posts)

1. The Brownback playbook is being used by Bevin in KY. But Bevin will likely end being removed

Reply to thomhartmann (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 05:11 PM

Jun 2016

He has been replacing non-political appointees, stopping road projects, and trying to cut education funding. Getting in wayyy over his head.

Stevepol

(4,234 posts)

3. They'd do better to replace the voting machines that said he won his election.

Reply to tonyt53 (Reply #1)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 05:50 PM

Jun 2016

If Bevin is removed and the voting machines remain without any means of verification it'll just open the door for somebody equally bone-headed to screw up KY even more.

And the same can be said for KS. If it weren't for the voting machines in KS, I doubt Brownie would have been elected.

bjobotts

(9,141 posts)

2. Brownback has destroyed Kansas for reg people but the super rich don't care

Reply to thomhartmann (Original post)

Mon Jun 20, 2016, 05:31 PM

Jun 2016

Reply to this discussion