Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox & Friends disappointed when legal analyst explains why census question is unconstitutional (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2018 OP
Couldn't get past the first 30 seconds... HopeAgain Mar 2018 #1
THE RELEVANT PART STARTS AT 2:10. nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2018 #2
It sounds complicated, whether they can do that. Sounds like they can.... Honeycombe8 Mar 2018 #3
He never said the question was unconstitutional DrunkInTheAfternoon Mar 2018 #4
do we have to answer the question? we were thinking of checking 'NO' on that item.. samnsara Mar 2018 #5
Michelle Bachmann was encouraging people not to respond to the 2010 census. rickford66 Mar 2018 #6
The next move is for the Repuke Congress to tell the Census Bureau lapfog_1 Mar 2018 #7

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
3. It sounds complicated, whether they can do that. Sounds like they can....
Tue Mar 27, 2018, 11:22 AM
Mar 2018

but people don't have to answer.

They're trying to get a head count of eligible voters. I suppose they could take the data, and count just the ones that answered the question, and answered it in the affirmative...and that would be the eligible voter count. That wouldn't be accurate. But there is no current way to be accurate, now, as far as I know.

I never gave that any thought before. An interesting topic.

 
4. He never said the question was unconstitutional
Tue Mar 27, 2018, 11:42 AM
Mar 2018

He did say that people have the right not to answer. But, that's a different point altogether...

rickford66

(5,520 posts)
6. Michelle Bachmann was encouraging people not to respond to the 2010 census.
Tue Mar 27, 2018, 12:12 PM
Mar 2018
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rep-bachmann-refuses-to-fill-out-2010-census/

Bachmann, a Republican, said her family will only be indicating the number of people in the household, because "the Constitution doesn't require any information beyond that."


I guess it was OK then.

lapfog_1

(29,189 posts)
7. The next move is for the Repuke Congress to tell the Census Bureau
Tue Mar 27, 2018, 12:27 PM
Mar 2018

to reject forms not completely filled out.

That would have the same effect as the first objective which is to scare immigrants (legal or otherwise) to simply not answer any questions.

By not counting or scaring off some people, representation and federal dollars to those districts will be less. Since most if not ALL of the people not counted actually pay taxes, this is "taxation without representation". A phrase that I believe I heard before in some history class.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Fox & Friends disappointe...