Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

DonViejo

(60,536 posts) Mon May 7, 2018, 03:23 PM May 2018

Fox's Andrew Napolitano: Judge's criticism of Mueller means 'nothing'

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/foxs-andrew-napolitano-crushes-judge-criticized-mueller-opinion-means-nothing/

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fox's Andrew Napolitano: Judge's criticism of Mueller means 'nothing' (Original Post) DonViejo May 2018 OP

This worries me-I agree with this idiot Gothmog May 2018 #1

I think I can see why dipshit Hannity doesn't have Napolitano on his show anymore. TrollBuster9090 May 2018 #2

Gothmog

(145,079 posts)

1. This worries me-I agree with this idiot

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon May 7, 2018, 03:36 PM

May 2018

TrollBuster9090

(5,954 posts)

2. I think I can see why dipshit Hannity doesn't have Napolitano on his show anymore.

Reply to DonViejo (Original post)

Mon May 7, 2018, 05:47 PM

May 2018

The only 'legal experts' he has on his show now are Greg Jarret (worst wig on TV outside of a revival tent), and Judge Jeanine 'Fish-face' Pirro.

Poor old Napolitano was Laura Ingraham's first guest for her new Fox TV show, and during her interview of him he let it slip that he got Ingraham her first job in law because he was DATING her at the time. Thus confessing to nepotism and corruption for both of their careers. He never got invited back.

And Hannity is sure never going to invite somebody who might accidentally say something true. He sticks to his comfort goats, Jarret, Pirro, Malkin, and 'Dr. Evil' Gorrrrrka.

Reply to this discussion